cpu/intel/smm: Drop em64t save state
This save state is just plainly wrong in many regards and em64t100 should be used. Checked with a model 0x17 core2 CPU. Change-Id: I4d89691e87c91dd12b34a44b74849b18b4ac5369 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36660 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Patrick Georgi
parent
7f8b0cd89c
commit
1818733faa
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
|
||||
#include <cpu/x86/smm.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/x86/smi_deprecated.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/amd/amd64_save_state.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/intel/em64t_save_state.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/intel/em64t100_save_state.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/intel/em64t101_save_state.h>
|
||||
#include <cpu/x86/legacy_save_state.h>
|
||||
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
typedef enum {
|
||||
AMD64,
|
||||
EM64T,
|
||||
EM64T100,
|
||||
EM64T101,
|
||||
LEGACY
|
||||
} save_state_type_t;
|
||||
@@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||
save_state_type_t type;
|
||||
union {
|
||||
amd64_smm_state_save_area_t *amd64_state_save;
|
||||
em64t_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t_state_save;
|
||||
em64t100_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t100_state_save;
|
||||
em64t101_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t101_state_save;
|
||||
legacy_smm_state_save_area_t *legacy_state_save;
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -178,10 +177,10 @@ void smi_handler(u32 smm_revision)
|
||||
SMM_LEGACY_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0x00030100:
|
||||
state_save.type = EM64T;
|
||||
state_save.em64t_state_save =
|
||||
state_save.type = EM64T100;
|
||||
state_save.em64t100_state_save =
|
||||
smm_save_state(smm_base,
|
||||
SMM_EM64T_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
|
||||
SMM_EM64T100_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0x00030101: /* SandyBridge, IvyBridge, and Haswell */
|
||||
state_save.type = EM64T101;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user