cpu/intel/smm: Drop em64t save state

This save state is just plainly wrong in many regards and em64t100
should be used.

Checked with a model 0x17 core2 CPU.

Change-Id: I4d89691e87c91dd12b34a44b74849b18b4ac5369
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36660
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Arthur Heymans
2019-11-07 08:18:14 +01:00
committed by Patrick Georgi
parent 7f8b0cd89c
commit 1818733faa
3 changed files with 7 additions and 111 deletions

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
#include <cpu/x86/smm.h>
#include <cpu/x86/smi_deprecated.h>
#include <cpu/amd/amd64_save_state.h>
#include <cpu/intel/em64t_save_state.h>
#include <cpu/intel/em64t100_save_state.h>
#include <cpu/intel/em64t101_save_state.h>
#include <cpu/x86/legacy_save_state.h>
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@
typedef enum {
AMD64,
EM64T,
EM64T100,
EM64T101,
LEGACY
} save_state_type_t;
@@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ typedef struct {
save_state_type_t type;
union {
amd64_smm_state_save_area_t *amd64_state_save;
em64t_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t_state_save;
em64t100_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t100_state_save;
em64t101_smm_state_save_area_t *em64t101_state_save;
legacy_smm_state_save_area_t *legacy_state_save;
};
@@ -178,10 +177,10 @@ void smi_handler(u32 smm_revision)
SMM_LEGACY_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
break;
case 0x00030100:
state_save.type = EM64T;
state_save.em64t_state_save =
state_save.type = EM64T100;
state_save.em64t100_state_save =
smm_save_state(smm_base,
SMM_EM64T_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
SMM_EM64T100_ARCH_OFFSET, node);
break;
case 0x00030101: /* SandyBridge, IvyBridge, and Haswell */
state_save.type = EM64T101;