Split the two usages of __ROMCC__:

__ROMCC__ now means "Don't use prototypes, since romcc doesn't support them."
__PRE_RAM__ means "Use simpler versions of functions, and no device tree."

There are probably some places where both are tested, but only one is needed.

Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4921 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1

src/cpu/amd/dualcore/dualcore_id.c

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 #include <arch/cpu.h>
 #include <cpu/amd/dualcore.h>
-#ifdef __ROMCC__
+#ifdef __PRE_RAM__
 #include <cpu/amd/model_fxx_msr.h>
 #endif
 

src/cpu/amd/microcode/microcode.c

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
  */
 
-#ifndef __ROMCC__
+#ifndef __PRE_RAM__
 
 #include <stdint.h>
 #include <console/console.h>

src/cpu/amd/model_10xxx/apic_timer.c

@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
 #include <cpu/x86/lapic.h>
 
 /* NOTE: We use the APIC TIMER register is to hold flags for AP init during
- * pre-memory init (ROMCC). Don't use init_timer() and  udelay is redirected
- * to udelay_tsc().
+ * pre-memory init (__PRE_RAM__). Don't use init_timer() and  udelay is
+ * redirected to udelay_tsc().
  */
 
 

src/cpu/amd/model_10xxx/update_microcode.c

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
  */
 
 
-#ifndef __ROMCC__
+#ifndef __PRE_RAM__
 #include <console/console.h>
 #include <device/device.h>
 #include <device/pci.h>
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 
 static const u8 microcode_updates[] __attribute__ ((aligned(16))) = {
 
-#ifdef __ROMCC__
+#ifdef __PRE_RAM__
 
 /* From the Revision Guide :
  * Equivalent Processor Table for AMD Family 10h Processors

src/cpu/amd/quadcore/quadcore_id.c

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 
 #include <arch/cpu.h>
 #include <cpu/amd/quadcore.h>
-#ifdef __ROMCC__
+#ifdef __PRE_RAM__
 #include <cpu/amd/model_10xxx_msr.h>
 #endif
 

src/cpu/x86/smm/smmrelocate.S

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 #include <arch/asm.h>
 
 // Make sure no stage 2 code is included:
-#define __ROMCC__
+#define __PRE_RAM__
 
 // FIXME: Is this piece of code southbridge specific, or 
 // can it be cleaned up so this include is not required?