timestamps: Rename timestamps to make names more consistent

This patch aims to make timestamps more consistent in naming,
to follow one pattern. Until now there were many naming patterns:
- TS_START_*/TS_END_*
- TS_BEFORE_*/TS_AFTER_*
- TS_*_START/TS_*_END
This change also aims to indicate, that these timestamps can be used
to create time-ranges, e.g. from TS_BOOTBLOCK_START to TS_BOOTBLOCK_END.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I533e32392224d9b67c37e6a67987b09bf1cf51c6
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62019
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Czapiga
2022-02-15 11:50:31 +01:00
committed by Felix Held
parent e96ade6981
commit ad6157ebdf
52 changed files with 276 additions and 276 deletions

View File

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void cbmem_add_cros_vpd(int is_recovery)
{
struct vpd_cbmem *cbmem;
timestamp_add_now(TS_START_COPYVPD);
timestamp_add_now(TS_COPYVPD_START);
init_vpd_rdevs();
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void cbmem_add_cros_vpd(int is_recovery)
printk(BIOS_ERR, "Couldn't read RO VPD\n");
cbmem->ro_size = ro_size = 0;
}
timestamp_add_now(TS_END_COPYVPD_RO);
timestamp_add_now(TS_COPYVPD_RO_END);
}
if (rw_size) {
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void cbmem_add_cros_vpd(int is_recovery)
printk(BIOS_ERR, "Couldn't read RW VPD\n");
cbmem->rw_size = rw_size = 0;
}
timestamp_add_now(TS_END_COPYVPD_RW);
timestamp_add_now(TS_COPYVPD_RW_END);
}
init_vpd_rdevs_from_cbmem();