Clean up architecture-specific Kconfigs
It's an unfortunate side effect of our different-archs-per-stage mechanism that all src/arch/*/Kconfig files are always parsed with no if blocks to exclude them if they're not relevant. This makes it very easy to accidentally rely on a Kconfig default set by a totally different and not applying architecture. This patch moves a few Kconfigs from ARM and X86 that leaked out like this into a common Kconfig file for clarity. It also gives ARM64 its own BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM mechanism so that it doesn't leech off the ARM one (currently not used by any board). In the future, we should maybe prefix all options in the arch/*/Kconfig files with the architecture name (such as X86_BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL and ARM_LPAE are already doing), to make it more apparent when they are used in the wrong place. BUG=None TEST=None (tested together with dependent changes) Change-Id: I3e8bb3dfbb2c4edada621ce16d130bd7387d4eb8 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5528aa9252cdf711af3c160da387c6a7bebe9e76 Original-Change-Id: Ieb2d79bae6c6800be0f93ca3489b658008b1dfae Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219171 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9235 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
This commit is contained in:
		
				
					committed by
					
						 Patrick Georgi
						Patrick Georgi
					
				
			
			
				
	
			
			
			
						parent
						
							db273065f6
						
					
				
				
					commit
					c3e7c4e7b4
				
			| @@ -49,10 +49,6 @@ config RAMBASE | ||||
| 	hex | ||||
| 	default 0x100000 | ||||
|  | ||||
| config STACK_SIZE | ||||
| 	hex | ||||
| 	default 0x1000 | ||||
|  | ||||
| # This is something you almost certainly don't want to mess with. | ||||
| # How many SIPIs do we send when starting up APs and cores? | ||||
| # The answer in 2000 or so was '2'. Nowadays, on many systems, | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user