sravan/system76-coreboot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

arch/x86: remove low coreboot table support

Browse Source 
In addition to being consistent with all other architectures,
all chipsets support cbmem so the low coreboot table path is
stale and never taken.  Also it's important to note the memory
written in to that low area of memory wasn't automatically
reserved unless that path was taken. To that end remove
low coreboot table support for x86.

Change-Id: Ib96338cf3024e3aa34931c53a7318f40185be34c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14432
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Aaron Durbin
2016-04-19 16:11:22 -05:00
parent 86cbfa00d0
commit dcee908921
2 changed files with 3 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
src/arch/x86/tables.c
View File

@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static unsigned long write_smbios_table(unsigned long rom_table_end)
void write_tables(void)
{
unsigned long low_table_start, low_table_end;
unsigned long rom_table_start, rom_table_end;
unsigned long rom_table_end;
/* Even if high tables are configured, some tables are copied both to
* the low and the high area, so payloads and OSes don't need to know
@ -191,7 +191,6 @@ void write_tables(void)
*/
unsigned long high_table_pointer;
rom_table_start = 0xf0000;
rom_table_end = 0xf0000;
/* Start low addr at 0x500, so we don't run into conflicts with the BDA
@ -242,8 +241,6 @@ void write_tables(void)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "coreboot table: %ld bytes.\n",
new_high_table_pointer - high_table_pointer);
} else {
/* The coreboot table must be in 0-4K or 960K-1M */
write_coreboot_table(low_table_start, low_table_end,
rom_table_start, rom_table_end);
printk(BIOS_ERR, "Could not add CBMEM for coreboot table.\n");
}
}