Don't check exclusive IRQ fieldin the PIR table.
This field is rarely used (and not used in the LX tables). There is not a good reason to mask off non-exclusive IRQs. Signed-off-by: Marc Jones(marc.jones@amd.com) Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3219 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Marc Jones
parent
0dc5697220
commit
df22f780f1
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void pirq_routing_irqs(unsigned long addr)
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
|
||||
|
||||
int link = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].link;
|
||||
int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap & pirq_tbl->exclusive_irqs;
|
||||
int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap;
|
||||
int irq = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
printk_debug("INT: %c link: %x bitmap: %x ",
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user