Don't check exclusive IRQ fieldin the PIR table.

This field is rarely used (and not used in the LX tables).
There is not a good reason to mask off non-exclusive IRQs. 

Signed-off-by: Marc Jones(marc.jones@amd.com)
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> 



git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3219 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This commit is contained in:
Marc Jones(marc.jones
2008-04-07 17:49:57 +00:00
committed by Marc Jones
parent 0dc5697220
commit df22f780f1
6 changed files with 1 additions and 1258 deletions

View File

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void pirq_routing_irqs(unsigned long addr)
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
int link = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].link;
int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap & pirq_tbl->exclusive_irqs;
int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap;
int irq = 0;
printk_debug("INT: %c link: %x bitmap: %x ",