These files were trying to document the parameters, but didn't have
the syntax quite right. Change the comments from @varname to
@param varname as required by doxygen.
Change-Id: I63662094d3f1686e3e35b61925b580eb06e72e28
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8100
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Peppy had some issues with FUI. We decided it was time to create
peppy-specific gma.c and i915io.c files. Using yabel and the i915tool,
we generated a replay attack, then interpolated against the slippy
i915io.c to get something working.
Also, in preparation for moving code out of the mainboard gma.c to
generic driver code, we got rid of some hardcodes in the mainboard
gma.c that have no business being there. The worst were the
computation of gmch_[m,n] and it turns out that we had some
long-standing bugs related to confusion about 'bpp'. I've killed the
word bpp everywhere I could because there are at least 3 things that
correspond to bpp. We now have framebuffer, pipe, and panel bpp. The
names are long because I want to avoid all the mistakes we've all been
making in the last year :-) Sadly, that means a lot of changes not just
peppy-related, but they are simple and in a good cause.
The test pattern generation is driven by a global variable in
mainboard/peppy/gma.c. I've found in the past that it's very useful
to have a function like this available, as one can activate it while
using a jtag debugger: halt at the right place in ramstage, set the
variable to 1, continue. It's not enough code to worry about always
including.
The last hard-codes for M and N registers are gone, and the function
to set from generic intel_dp.c code works. To avoid screen trash on a
dev mode boot, which we liked but nobody else did :-), we now take the
time to put a pleasing background color that sort of doubles as a
power LED.
Rough timing is ramstage start is at 2.2, and dev setup is done at
3.3. These new platforms are depressingly slow to boot. Rom init alone
is taking 1.9 seconds. 13 years ago it was 3 seconds from power on to bash
prompt. These CPUs are at least 10x faster and take much longer to get going.
Future work, once we get this through, is to move more functions to the
intel driver, and combine the mainboard i915io.c into the mainboard gma.c.
That separation only existed because i915io.c was generated by a tool, and it
had lots of ugliness. Most ugliness is gone.
Old-Change-Id: I6a6295b423a41e263f82cef33eacb92a14163321
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170013
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan.m.shaikh@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8cdaf73e3602e15925859866714db4d5ec6c947d)
snow: Fix a typo in devicetree.cb that was breaking the snow build.
A typo in a recent change broke the snow build.
Old-Change-Id: I93074e68eb3d21510d974fd8e9c63b3947285afd
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171014
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 154876c126a6690930141df178485658533096d2)
Squashed a fix into the initial patch and updated nehalem/gma.c
to have a non-static gtt_poll.
Change-Id: I2f4342c610d87335411da1d6d405171dc80c1f14
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6657
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
A large portion of documented registers have been initialized using macros. Only a few
undocumented registers are left out. i915io.c looks lot more cleaner by removing redundant
calls. However, some more work is required to correctly identify which calls are not required.
All the io_writes are replaced by gtt_writes.
Change-Id: I077a235652c7d5eb90346cd6e15cc48b5161e969
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66204
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 39f3289f68b527575b0a120960ff67f78415815e)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6600
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
... based on the EDID detailed timing values for
pixel_clock and link_clock.
Two undocumented registers 0x6f040 and 0x6f044 correspond to link_m and link_n
respectively. Other two undocumented registers 0x6f030 and 0x6f034 correspond
to data_m and data_n respectively.
Calculations are based on the intel_link_compute_m_n from linux kernel.
Currently, the value for 0x6f030 does not come up right with our calculations.
Hence, set to hard-coded value.
Change-Id: I40ff411729d0a61759164c3c1098504973f9cf5e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/62915
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4381
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
The intel_ddi.c change I thought should be in but I don't see it. It just adds two functions back
that we need.
There are two new files for slippy annotated with comments about how it needs to evolve.
That said, this code has been tested on 3 different panels. Both dev and non-dev usages work.
physbase initialization to static value removed.
Moved spin calls to intel_dp_*
Change-Id: I0480af45c21c7dedcaff7e8be729f0eb554ec78a
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/61136
Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4370
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
