There are mainboards that do not have any graphics ports connected to
the SoC. It would be senseless to initialize the iGD, thus add a new
mainboard Kconfig to hide the GOP option.
Change-Id: Ica3b3a7a0c8120c95412369a24d8d669fb59fded
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36348
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
cbmem_top() should simply not be called before memory is initialed,
in order for the implementation to return something meaningful.
Change-Id: I8fe32844af290626a0f91279143fda4d3442680f
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36334
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
So, this is odd in multiple ways. First of all, we fix something:
We work around a weirdness in `make oldconfig` that adds spurious
entries into the `auto.conf` for choices that were given a symbol
name.
When introducing the Ada config package, it seemed reasonable to
use `auto.conf` as source, but it turned out that we didn't use it
as input, only `config.h` and the original `.config` were used. As
the syntax for `.config` is the same as for `auto.conf` we use the
former now as input for Ada, too. One question remains: If `.config`
already contains all required information, what is this `auto.conf`
and what does it want?
Alternatively, we could try to fix `oldconfig` or add a linter to
forbid named choices. I thought, our build test would reject the
latter already. But the `oldconfig` behaviour is too subtle.
We keep a dependency on the `oldconfig` step, to make sure it runs
first.
Change-Id: If3fe6bc782251cdbd696395d3069a1c0bb0ae802
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36320
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
New changes in the latest binutils 2.32 lead to assembler errors causes
ipxe build failure. IPXE uses the divide test which requires /dev/null as
input as well as the output file name.
This patch facilitates the /dev/null as an exception to the current
changes in binutils package while building crossgcc for coreboot leads to
successful build of ipxe and further tests to pass based on /dev/null and
applies automatically during the crossgcc rebuild.
Also, this can be reverted once binutils/ipxe provides an updated release
in this respect.
Fixes: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/204
Change-Id: I9f664829b8c42420c0b2ab1f2316150f86ac0b1a
Signed-off-by: Himanshu Sahdev <himanshusah@hcl.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35098
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Remove the calculation of the Reserved Intel MMIO Memory size from
systemagent and memmap, since it is not needed.
The size is used in SA to calculate the space between cbmem_top and TSEG
without DPR and Chipset Reserved Memory. Since this will always be equal
to 0, the reservation will be skipped and TSEG, DPR and Chipset Reserved
Memory will get reserved alltogether.
By reading the code and pratical testing we figured out that:
- TSEG - DPR - reserved - top_of_memory == 0
- TSEG - DPR - reserved == top_of_memory
This means the whole block will never reserve anything because it is
always 0. Hence the code can be removed for simplification.
Tested successfully on X11SSM-F
Change-Id: I0cc730551eb3a79c78a971b40056de8d029f4b82
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
This drops support for FSP 1.1 in soc/intel/skylake, after all boards
have been migrated to FSP 2.0, which is backwards compatible.
Any moving of files happens in a follow-up commit to make review easier.
Change-Id: I0dd2eab0edfda0545ff94c3908b8574d5ad830bd
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35813
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This patch is part of the patch series to drop support for FSP 1.1 in
soc/intel/skylake.
The following modifications have been done to migrate the board(s) from
FSP 1.1 to FSP 2.0:
- remove deprecated devicetree VR_RING domain (only 4 domains in FSP 2.0)
TODO:
- testing
Change-Id: I7481f3413de6780df01d9b769bd4f16d439f087c
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35923
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
- This port should be Reclaim Your Freedom compliant
(not certified yet).
- Untested on boards with external Radeon graphics adapter.
- Some columns on the left-most side of display are completely
black on 1400x1050 IPS display[1]. Display works fine on Linux.
I don't know why it appears like that. So far it has been observed
only with native graphics initialization.
- Only GRUB2 and SeaBIOS payloads tested for now.
- 2504 docking station USB doesn't work under Linux.
Can detect pendrive in GRUB2 payload.
- Sometimes it takes 20s of "pretending it's powered off" to run
coreboot code. Issue is payload agnostic.
Probably caused by missing one capacitor on my unit.
[1] https://imgur.com/a/0wpMGsm
Change-Id: Ibd9208a5eafd228f8eedbc8fb4f4eb9ed1932a14
Signed-off-by: Maciej Matuszczyk <maccraft123mc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35864
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Remove SMM reinitialization since it's already done in src/ec/lenovo/h8.
Untested on a real hardware.
See also commit 8953d4a1 with Change-Id
I33fd829a7e34aefa8f76ca6020cc8e802f7aab17 ("mb/lenovo/*/smihandler: Get
rid of mainboard_io_trap_handler").
Change-Id: Icc582527db15f3a31cdee8948bc5a190240fdc84
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36235
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
mainboard_silicon_init_params() is supposed to be used for only
overriding any FSP params as per mainboard configuration. GPIOs should
be configured by mainboard as part of its chip init(). This ensures
proper ordering w.r.t. any common operations that the SoC code might
want to perform e.g. snapshot ITSS polarities.
This change moves the configuration of GPIOs from
mainboard_silicon_init_params() to mainboard chip->init().
Change-Id: I5d10c01c5b9d5f8ed02274d51dcf9c2a17269685
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36270
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
mainboard_silicon_init_params() is supposed to be used for only
overriding any FSP params as per mainboard configuration. GPIOs should
be configured by mainboard as part of its chip init(). This ensures
proper ordering w.r.t. any common operations that the SoC code might
want to perform e.g. snapshot ITSS polarities.
This change moves the configuration of GPIOs from
mainboard_silicon_init_params() to mainboard chip->init().
Change-Id: I5cd89c6e24b6a4b0c20fd476915f3781a0d46e0d
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36269
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathew King <mathewk@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
mainboard_silicon_init_params() is supposed to be used for only
overriding any FSP params as per mainboard configuration. GPIOs should
be configured by mainboard as part of its chip init(). This ensures
proper ordering w.r.t. any common operations that the SoC code might
want to perform e.g. snapshot ITSS polarities.
This change moves the configuration of GPIOs from
mainboard_silicon_init_params() to mainboard chip->init().
Change-Id: Ied0201b954894acd3503801e7739b91a2cc9b4a8
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36268
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
mainboard_silicon_init_params() is supposed to be used for only
overriding any FSP params as per mainboard configuration. GPIOs should
be configured by mainboard as part of its chip init(). This ensures
proper ordering w.r.t. any common operations that the SoC code might
want to perform e.g. snapshot ITSS polarities.
This change moves the configuration of GPIOs from
mainboard_silicon_init_params() to mainboard
chip->init(). Additionally, this change moves mainboard_ec_init() to
mainboard dev->init().
TEST=Verified that GPIOs are configured properly and hatch boots to
OS.
Change-Id: Ia509471a3678c60454cd4f14625f151860d9b9d2
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36267
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Set VPD keys for DSM parameters in overridetree.cb for Helios.
RT1011 driver will load values from VPD and set them to device property.
BUG=b:140397934
BRANCH=none
TEST=On Helios, with patch series, check realtek,r0_calib and
realtek,temperature_calib are available to rt1011 codec driver.
Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ic72fd57becf93e70a1a716dbb76633509f2fd5c1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36031
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
