What is described by the comment has already been fixed in f0d038f4
(flash: use two bytes of device ID to identify stmicro chips).
This also means that STM_ID_N25Q128 doesn't have to be at the top of
stmicro_spi_flash_table anymore.
TEST=Untested, due to lack of hardware
Change-Id: I7a9e9a0cdfdb1cf34e914e186fc6957c1d9b5ca6
Signed-off-by: David Imhoff <dimhoff_devel@xs4all.nl>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10068
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Bootblock does not allow using malloc, use statically allocated chip
structures instead.
BRANCH=storm
BUG=chrome-os-partner:33489
TEST=both drivers compile when configured in, also booted whirlwind
with an STM compatible SPI NOR flash.
Change-Id: I154c33ce5fc278d594205d8b8e62a56edb4e177e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: eedbb959a595e0898e7a1dd551fc7c517a02f370
Original-Change-Id: I29b37107ac1d58a293f531f59ee76b3d8c4b3e7c
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/248992
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9772
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
A payload may want to run erase operations on SPI NOR flash without
re-probing the device to get its properties. This patch passes up
three properties of flash to achieve that:
- The size of the flash device
- The sector size, i.e., the granularity of erase
- The command used for erase
The patch sends the parameters through coreboot and then libpayload.
The patch also includes a minor refactoring of the flash erase code.
Parameters are sent up for just one flash device. If multiple SPI
flash devices are probed, the second one will "win" and its
parameters will be sent up to the payload.
TEST=Observed parameters to be passed up to depthcharge through
libpayload and be used to correctly initialize flash and do an erase.
TEST=Winbond and Gigadevices spi flash drivers compile with the changes;
others don't, for seemingly unrelated reasons.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:446377
Change-Id: Ib8be86494b5a3d1cfe1d23d3492e3b5cba5f99c6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 988c8c68bbfcdfa69d497ea5f806567bc80f8126
Original-Change-Id: Ie2b3a7f5b6e016d212f4f9bac3fabd80daf2ce72
Original-Signed-off-by: Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/239570
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9726
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This consolidates all calls to spi_claim_bus() and spi_release_bus()
to a single location where spi_xfer() is called. This avoids confusing
(and potentially redundant) calls that were being done throughout the
generic spi_flash.c functions and chip-specific functions.
I don't think the current approach could even work since many chip
drivers assert /CS once and then issue multiple commands such as page
program followed by reading the status register. I suspect the reason
we didn't notice it on x86 is because the ICH/PCH handled each
individual command correctly (spi_claim_bus() and spi_release_bus()
are noops) in spite of the broken code.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=tested on nyan and link
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: I3257e2f6a2820834f4c9018069f90fcf2bab05f6
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/194510
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit d3394d34fb49e9e252f67371674d5b3aa220bc9e)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Ieb62309b18090d8f974f91a6e448af3d65dd3d1d
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7829
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Support added for Micron N25Q128 SPI flash, which has
the same manufacturer id as ST Micro. Jedec ID =
0x20 0xBB 0x18. Since existing stmicro.c only compares
the last device id byte, this flash is mistakenly
identified as M25P128, which has ID = 0x20 0x20 0x18.
To handle this situation and avoid breaking code for
existing devices, a two byte .id member is added.
New devices should be added to the beginning of the
flash table array with .idcode = STM_ID_USE_ALT_ID and
.id = the two byte jedec device id.
A 4KB subsector erase capability is added and used for
this new device. It requires using a different SPI
op-code supported by adding .op_erase member. Previous
devices defined in stmicro.c are assigned their original
op-code for 64KB sector erase.
N25Q128 is now working on a custom designed Bayley Bay
based board. Tested by verifying the MRC fastboot cache
is successfully (re)written. Note that previous devices
were not retested.
Change-Id: Ic63d86958bf8d301898a157b435f549a0dd9893c
Signed-off-by: Scott Radcliffe <sradcliffe@microind.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7077
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
SPI controllers in Intel and AMD bridges have a slightly different
restriction on how long transactions they can handle.
Change-Id: I3d149d4b7e7e9633482a153d5e380a86c553d871
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6163
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
There are two separate restrictions to take into account:
Page Program command must not cross address boundaries defined by the
flash part's page size.
Total number of bytes for any command sent to flash part is restricted
by the SPI controller capabilities.
Consider
CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT=64, page_size=256, offset=62, len=4.
This write would be split at offset 64 for no reason.
Consider
CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT=40, page_size=256, offset=254, len=4.
This write would not be split at page boundary as required.
We do not really hit the second case. Nevertheless, CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT
is a misnomer for the maximum payload length supported by the SPI controller
and is removed in a followup.
Change-Id: I727f2e7de86a91b6a509460ff1f374acd006a0bc
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6162
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Ported from spi/winbond.c.
Fixes this error:
ICH SPI: Too much to write.
Does your SPI chip driver use CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT?
Change-Id: I50db8fd1104d3b7d319b278b14f97e3ff9cb6404
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3877
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
For whatever reason tabs got inserted in the license header text.
Remove one occurrence of that with the following command [1].
$ git grep -l 'MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.'$'\t' | xargs sed -i 's,MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.[ ]*,MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\ \ ,'
[1] http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/tutorials/sedfaq.txt
Change-Id: Iaf4ed32c32600c3b23c08f8754815b959b304882
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2460
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTembedded.de>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu <cristi.magherusan@gmail.com>
The SB800 and Hudson now support adding the IMC ROM which runs from the same
chip as coreboot. When the IMC is running, write or erase commands sent to
the spi bus will fail, and the IMC will die. To fix this, we send a request
to the IMC to stop fetching from the SPI rom while we write to it. This
process (in one form or another) is required for writes to the SPI bus while
the IMC is running.
Because the IMC can take up to 500ms to respond every time we claim the
bus, this patch tries to keep the number of times we need to do that to a
minimum. We only need to claim the bus on writes, and using a counter for
the semaphore allows us to call in once to claim the bus at the beginning
of a number of transactions and it will stay claimed until we release it
at the end of the transactions.
Claim() - takes up to 500ms hit
claim() - no delay
erase()
release()
claim() - no delay
write()
release()
Release()
Change-Id: I4e003c5122a2ed47abce57ab8b92dee6aa4713ed
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1976
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Fix debug printks which were not using CONFIG_DEBUG_SPI_FLASH,
which would cause long delays durring boot when SPI devices
were written.
Change-Id: I99fc3d5f847fdf4bb98e2a0342ea418ab7d5fc54
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1965
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Only print PP: lines if CONFIG_DEBUG_SPI_FLASH is enabled.
Change-Id: If25e916ecb585f37c90d42980e933a6cd1a3d956
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1045
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
- use %zu instead of %zd for size_t (%zd is for ssize_t)
- use %x instead of %lx for u32
- break some long lines to avoid commit hook trouble
Change-Id: Idfad716523dbcd2a595d26317240e972b5253e8b
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1041
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This driver is taken from u-boot and adapted to match
coreboot. It still contains some hacks and is ICH specific
at places.
Change-Id: I97dd8096f7db3b62f8f4f4e4d08bdee10d88f689
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/997
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
