SSD reset pin had been added on DVT2, the power sequnence requires
toggle in boot stage.
BUG=b:130741066
TEST=Boot up with simulated DVT2 platform and confirm SSD can be
detected during warm reboot.
Signed-off-by: Lijian Zhao <lijian.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie734875a49b8b61f8b813c473d30cbcaf4dd13d1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32434
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
When coreboot checks the TPM and key-ladder state it issues a reboot of
the Cr50 with a delay parameter. Older Cr50 code doesn't support the
delay parameter and reboots immediately, which prevented coreboot from
running the mainboard specific code needed for the AP to come back up.
This change calls mainboard_prepare_cr50_reset() prior to sending the
VENDOR_CC_IMMEDIATE_RESET command.
This change also fixes a false error message from the coreboot log that
indicated "Unexpected Cr50 TPM mode 3" when the Cr50 key ladder is
disabled.
BUG=b:130830178
BRANCH=none
TEST=build coreboot on sarien and grunt platforms.
TEST=Load Cr50 v3.15, run 'gsctool -a -m disable; reboot'. Verify
corebot send the
VENDOR_CC_IMMEDIATE_RESET command and that the AP boots normally.
Verify event log shows "cr50 Reset Required"
TEST=Force Cr50 automatic update. Verify event log shows "cr50 Update
Reset".
Change-Id: Ib05c9cfde8e87daffd4233114263de5b30822872
Signed-off-by: Keith Short <keithshort@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32365
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Commit 45d4b17 [nb/intel/sandybridge: Move southbridge code to bd82x6x]
moved early_pch_init() to the southbridge, but failed to include
early_pch.c for the non-native raminit case, which now fails to link.
As all boards default to native raminit, this was missed by the autobuilder.
Adjust early_pch.c to be compiled regardles of ram init type used
Test: build/boot google/stout with MRC ram init selected
Change-Id: I50db30fda9a1099fb434c04ea97bcc38f8455233
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32382
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Parameter passing is incorrect here, it should pass
complete StdHeader instead of attempting to fill
in HeapStatus that should be treated as a field private
to AGESA, based on where it is defined in the header
files.
Furthermore the while() loop did not evaluate the
return value. Feature can be brought back at a later
date after someone verifies it actually works correctly
across different stages.
Change-Id: Ib243b275f8700ecaeb330772c795d305c61899c5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31484
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Each entrypoint to AGESA goes through the same sequence
and have same the function signature.
To avoid introducing bunch of preprocessor magic, rename
all the agesawrapper_amdXXX() functions that are actual
entrypoints to AGESA API, make them static, and provide
a single exposed entry function agesa_execute_state().
Change-Id: I96ae1874132da3843aa42c2f4e8a59ec771d3893
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31483
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change will save touchscreen power leakage 2-3mW in S0iX and
increase T2 display time delay to meet display panel requirement.
BUG=b:129899315
TEST= Measure touchscreen power from Arcada during S0iX
Change-Id: I4b8f3fdc0d107b080c5febe6fa5d29ea5d1ed0fc
Signed-off-by: Roy Mingi Park <roy.mingi.park@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32311
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lijian Zhao <lijian.zhao@intel.com>
This change is mainly to control PlatformDebugConsent FSP UPD.
PlatformDebugConsent is enabled if SOC_INTEL_CANNONLAKE_DEBUG_CONSENT != 0.
PlatformDebugConsent in FspmUpd.h has the details.
BUG=b:130203864
TEST=boot ok and PlatformDebugConsent can be controlled by Kconfig
Change-Id: Ib845b5e42bc78fb352a0c97c6301f2aeca522f29
Signed-off-by: Kane Chen <kane.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32297
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
When the components like LCM ID are not installed (i.e., NC), ADC will
return some value with much larger variation from standard value (out of
the tolerance we set). To support that, we should check tolerance only
on non-NC voltages.
Also improve the error messages so we can see the ADC raw values
instead of simple assertion error (which makes debugging more difficult
since we have to build another firmware image just to print the values).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted on Kukui and got correct SKU ID for NC LCMID.
BRANCH=None
Change-Id: I8d00956e0e3b48ddbcaa505dd3ade24720c3b4ad
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32353
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: You-Cheng Syu <youcheng@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Currently, Arcada only supports D3hot during S0iX and there is leakage
power around 5~10mW depending on SSD vendors.
To support D3cold for SSD during S0iX, one MOSFET will be added on DVT2
and two GPIOs are required to be configured.
GPP_H13 is to control SSD_SCP_PWR_EN(power enable) and GPP_H12 is to
control SSD reset.
BUG=b:130741066
TEST=Measure SSD power during S0iX from Arcada(DVT2)
Change-Id: I868590e9e85d5df07930a3681884e3fc3a5c4d50
Signed-off-by: Roy Mingi Park <roy.mingi.park@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32361
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since there is no standardized naming scheme for the
FSP binaries, the option USE_FSP_REPO can't be used
on some platforms, because some of the filenames differ
and the build process awaits "Fsp_*.fd" as filename.
As a workaround, add the option -n to SplitFspBin.py,
which defines the basename.
Change-Id: Idc684ad00033ffafd1090fc32b23549ce9603b4f
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <migy@darmstadt.ccc.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/30930
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Previously Haswell used a romcc bootblock and starting verstage in
romstage was madatory but with C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK it is also
possible to have a separate verstage.
This selects using a separate verstage by default but still keeps the
option around to use verstage in romstage.
Also make sure mrc.bin is only added to the COREBOOT fmap region as it
requires to be run at a specific offset. This means that coreboot will
have to jump from a RW region to the RO region for that binary and
back to that RW region after that binary is done initializing the
memory.
Change-Id: I3b7b29f4a24c0fb830ff76fe31a35b6afcae4e67
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/26926
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This puts the cache-as-ram init in the bootblock.
Before setting up cache as ram the microcode updates are applied.
This removes the possibility for a normal/fallback setup although
implementing this should be quite easy.
Tested on Google peppy (Acer C720).
Setting up LPC in the bootblock to output console on SuperIOs is not
done in this patch, hence BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE is not yet enabled by
default.
Change-Id: Ia96499a9d478127f6b9d880883ac41397b58dbea
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/26859
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
