Coverity reported false-positive possible memory overrun
in setup_calloc_test(). Change memset address to use actual
buffer instead of pointer stored in symbol value in order
to silence Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I19f0718c657d565e515157e66367573e08f51254
Found-by: Coverity CID 1452005
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52136
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Some tests have to be able to catch assertion errors.
Adding CMocka mock_assert() enables that.
Additionally fix test_imd_create_tiered_empty(),
test_full_stack() and test_incorrectly_initialized_stack()
by adding missing expect_assert_failure().
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I5e8dd1b198ee6fab61e2be3f92baf1178f79bf18
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51804
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Some functions/macros like assert() require redefinition for testing
purposes. ENV_TEST is introduced to make it possible without using
bypass hacks.
This patch also adds a global __TEST__ define to TEST_CFLAGS for
all test targets in order to enable ENV_TEST.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Ib8f2932902a73a7dbe181adc82cc18437abb48e8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51803
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Some tested modules require regions to be defined but do not necessarily
access them. TEST_REGION_UNALLOCATED() combined with DECLARE_REGION()
are sufficient for most cases that require symbols only.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I51c5f6ce56575021c6e4277a9ed17263cd2e3bb2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51769
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
When running coreboot unit tests on a recent clang version, it helpfully
throws an error on memset(..., 0xAA, 0) because it thinks you probably
made a typo and meant to write memset(..., 0, 0xAA) instead. I mean, who
would ever memset() a buffer of zero bytes, right? Unfortunately, unit
tests for memset() want to do exactly that. Wrapping the argument in
parenthesis silences the warning.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I21aeb5ec4d6ce74d5df2d21e2f9084b17b3ac6e3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51617
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Until now output of all test groups run in single unit test were
saved in the same file which caused Jenkins to fail because
of existence of multiple root XML elements.
Now each test group is saved to its own file containing its name
at the end of the filename.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I21ba512073bc8d8693daad8a9b86d5b076bea03f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51281
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
This patch changes the memlayout macro infrastructure so that the size
of a region "xxx" (i.e. the distance between the symbols _xxx and _exxx)
is stored in a separate _xxx_size symbol. This has the advantage that
region sizes can be used inside static initializers, and also saves an
extra subtraction at runtime. Since linker symbols can only be treated
as addresses (not as raw integers) by C, retain the REGION_SIZE()
accessor macro to hide the necessary typecast.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ifd89708ca9bd3937d0db7308959231106a6aa373
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49332
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Memlayout is a mechanism to define memory areas outside the normal
program segment constructed by the linker. Therefore, it generally
doesn't make sense to relocate memlayout symbols when the program is
relocated. They tend to refer to things that are always in one specific
spot, independent of where the program is loaded.
This hasn't really hurt us in the past because the use case we have for
rmodules (ramstage on x86) just happens to not really need to refer to
any memlayout-defined areas at the moment. But that use case may come up
in the future so it's still worth fixing.
This patch declares all memlayout-defined symbols as ABSOLUTE() in the
linker, which is then reflected in the symbol table of the generated
ELF. We can then use that distinction to have rmodtool skip them when
generating the relocation table for an rmodule. (Also rearrange rmodtool
a little to make the primary string table more easily accessible to the
rest of the code, so we can refer to symbol names in debug output.)
A similar problem can come up with userspace unit tests, but we cannot
modify the userspace relocation toolchain (and for unfortunate
historical reasons, it tries to relocate even absolute symbols). We'll
just disable PIC and make those binaries fully static to avoid that
issue.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ic51d9add3dc463495282b365c1b6d4a9bf11dbf2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50629
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Clang doesn't seem to get along with some of the symbol magic we use for
memlayout and throws -Winline-asm warnings. Since we want to be
compatible with as many host compilers as possible (within reason),
let's disable that warning.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If1d88ed0bb2d10acfadcf8dec74fa3d227e0f790
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50825
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
This change updates the definition of config_of_soc() to a macro that
expands to __pci_0_00_0_config instead of accessing the config
structure by referencing the struct device. This allows linker to
optimize out unused portions of the device tree from early stages.
With this change, bootblock .text section size drops as follows:
Platform | Size without change | Size with change | Reduction |
---------------|---------------------|------------------|-------------|
GLK (ampton) | 27112 bytes | 9832 bytes | 17280 bytes |
APL (reef) | 26488 bytes | 17528 bytes | 8960 bytes |
TGL (volteer2) | 47760 bytes | 21648 bytes | 26112 bytes |
CML (hatch) | 40616 bytes | 22792 bytes | 17824 bytes |
JSL (waddledee)| 37872 bytes | 19408 bytes | 18464 bytes |
KBL (soraka) | 31840 bytes | 21568 bytes | 10272 bytes |
As static.h is now included in device.h which gets pulled in during
the unit tests, a dummy static.h is added under tests/include.
Change-Id: I1fbf5b9817065e967e46188739978a1cc96c2c7e
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49215
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Older GCCs don't support _Static_assert without a message string as the
second argument. AFAICT _Static_assert with two arguments is in C11 but
omitting the message argument is an extension.
The tests appear to be built with the system gcc rather than our
crossgcc so that's probably why this was not cought by CI.
Change-Id: I41fd0ffc42ded8b6d145c3ec30cc7407a78b9a43
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gröber <dxld@darkboxed.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48151
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
The current test framework builds the test code without any warnings at
all, which isn't great -- we have already slipped in some cases of
non-void functions not returning a defined value, for example. It would
likely be overkill to try to use all the same warnings we use for normal
coreboot code (e.g. some stuff like -Wmissing-prototypes makes cmocka's
__wrap_xxx() mock functions unnecessarily cumbersome to work with, and
other things like -Wvla may be appropriate for firmware but is probably
too aggressive for some simple test code). Therefore, let's just add
some of the stuff that points out the most obvious errors.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4d9801f52a8551f55f419f4141dc21ccb835d676
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42259
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Relying on Cmocka packages, which are provided with different OS
distributions, may introduce some problems with setup environments
across developers (e.g. library version mismatch). Instead, let's build
Cmocka from source code, which is now added to git submodules as
3rdparty/cmocka.
Please note, that cmake tool is required for building Cmocka (thus also
coreboot unit tests).
Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Ia947c5c60d5c58b76acebe4b614dd427ef995950
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This patch adds a basic test for the common region and region_device
APIs, sanity checking the basic functions and things like
overflow-handling. There is certainly more that could be added here, but
it's a start.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4932402f54768557e5b22b16e66220bd90ddebfd
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41046
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
