This change moves all ACPI table support in coreboot currently living
under arch/x86 into common code to make it architecture
independent. ACPI table generation is not really tied to any
architecture and hence it makes sense to move this to its own
directory.
In order to make it easier to review, this change is being split into
multiple CLs. This is change 3/5 which basically is generated by
running the following command:
$ git grep -iIl "arch/acpi" | xargs sed -i 's/arch\/acpi/acpi\/acpi/g'
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: I16b1c45d954d6440fb9db1d3710063a47b582eae
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40938
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
According to the POSIX standard, %p is supposed to print a pointer "as
if by %#x", meaning the "0x" prefix should automatically be prepended.
All other implementations out there (glibc, Linux, even libpayload) do
this, so we should make coreboot match. This patch changes vtxprintf()
accordingly and removes any explicit instances of "0x%p" from existing
format strings.
How to handle zero padding is less clear: the official POSIX definition
above technically says there should be no automatic zero padding, but in
practice most other implementations seem to do it and I assume most
programmers would prefer it. The way chosen here is to always zero-pad
to 32 bits, even on a 64-bit system. The rationale for this is that even
on 64-bit systems, coreboot always avoids using any memory above 4GB for
itself, so in practice all pointers should fit in that range and padding
everything to 64 bits would just hurt readability. Padding it this way
also helps pointers that do exceed 4GB (e.g. prints from MMU config on
some arm64 systems) stand out better from the others.
Change-Id: I0171b52f7288abb40e3fc3c8b874aee14b9bdcd6
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37626
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project
is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into
an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying
license headers at the same time.
Updated Authors file is in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: I1acea8c975d14904b7e486dc57a1a67480a6ee6e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36178
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
When generating entries in SSDT for DesignWare I2C controllers, only
use the speed selected in the devicetree, instead of trying all of them.
This quiets a message which looks like a bug ("dw_i2c: bad counts"),
later on in this driver when checking rise/fall times.
BUG=b:137298661
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boot and verify that I2C controllers still function, and
the nastygram message is gone.
Change-Id: I07207ec95652e8af1a42bfe31214f61a183a134e
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34385
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add an entry to the soc_clock table for a 216MHz clock so that
the I2C controller clock is calculated correctly when the I2C
bus is used in coreboot.
This was tested by measuring the I2C clock speed on H1 I2C bus
on a sarien board in coreboot and ensuring it is ~400KHz.
Change-Id: I6c3cacdad318a5ce41bc41e3ac81385c2d4f396c
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30068
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
The designware i2c controller indicates that the slave address
shouldn't be programmed while the controller is enabled. Therefore,
switch the ordering of the slave target address and the enable.
Additionally, ensure the controller is disabled prior to the
start of the slave programming sequence.
Lastly, chunk up the i2c_msg segments at differing slave address
boundaries. That allows for simpler programming for the controller
by only doing one slave address transaction chunk at a time.
BUG=b:70232394,b:69250772
Change-Id: Iebc08e2db847cb182fad98e0ff3d799b9a64aca7
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23513
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Right now dw_i2c_get_soc_cfg() is expecting the SoC to implement
that callback for obtaining the bus config. However, we're currently
forcing another parameter of struct device so one can do the lookup.
This works for Intel-based systems since the struct device was needed
to program the BAR, etc. However, from an API standpoint, it just
complicates matters by needing to obtain the struct device. The SoC
already has knowlege of its own devices so it can get the config
itself by bus number. Therefore, remove that contraint from the API.
BUG=b:70232394
Change-Id: Id8558f5deedda0963a46a532a7bf984e168fb270
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23420
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
In ramstage the device_operations are needed for the i2c designware
host controller. Move the intel/common/block/i2c implementation
into the generic driver so other platforms can take advantage of it.
BUG=b:72121803
Change-Id: Id249933fadcc016bfba00e7a6d65f56dfc220724
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23372
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
