This board runs well with coreboot. The documentation part of this
commit lists what works and what doesn't.
Tested with GRUB 2.02 as a payload, loading SeaBIOS 1.12.0 which then
boots FreeBSD 11.2. It has also been tested with GRUB directly booting
Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 (kernel 4.9).
Change-Id: I291573d4651bdffe24eb841033ea6189fcbf8502
Signed-off-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30357
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Add myself as a maintainer of the four mainboards I ported. For those
which were added as a variant, add myself as a maintainer of the whole
mainboard group.
Change-Id: I0e1b54279027fae82ea9f2825e6f27d38ef3c746
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29995
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
POWER8 is a specific implementation of ppc64, which is by now outdated
(POWER9 has been on the market for a while). Rename arch/power8/ to
potentially cover a wider range of hardware.
TEST=Toolchains built before/after this commit can build coreboot for
emulation/qemu-power8 from before/after this commit.
Change-Id: I2d6f08b12a9ffc8a652ddcd6f24ad85ecb33ca52
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29943
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
The reason for this code cleanup is the legacy
Google Purin board which isn't available anymore
and AFAIK never made it into the stores.
* Remove broadcom cygnus SoC support
* Remove /util/broadcom tool
* Remove Google Purin mainboard
* Remove MAINTAINERS entries
Change-Id: I148dd7eb0192d396cb69bc26c4062f88a764771a
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29905
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add myself as a maintainer for legacy Intel-based ChromeOS devices
for which I provide coreboot images as a comminuty member, and
as a maintainer for Purism devices in a professional capacity.
Change-Id: I70df3b9e4e36c2e5d73f8888fe0ec220aa8a91b7
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29913
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
The semantics in util/scripts/maintainers.go have changed in that a
file can be part of multiple components. This means that all files
are part of "the rest" now, which doesn't make much sense.
Change-Id: I220afe27e78aa5358fca61851242812f2d763992
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29657
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Remove FSP Sandy/Ivybrige which are unused.
* Open Source implementation isn't final but
good enough to replace FSP version.
* For new ports use NORTHBRIDGE_INTEL_IVYBRIDGE
and NORTHBRIDGE_INTEL_SANDYBRIDGE
Change-Id: I7b6bc4bfdd0481c8fe5b2b3d8f8b2eb9aa3c3b9e
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29402
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
<vendor> seems to be confused about the meaning of our maintainers list.
I get the feeling some use it to organize corporate internal teams and
branches, adding names to the list that don't show up in Gerrit and even
if, often don't react to reviewing requests (within months). Maybe they
even don't know that this is about coreboot.org?
To clarify this:
o Add an introductory paragraph mentioning development on coreboot.org.
o Explicitly state that maintainers should be registered to Gerrit.
o If a topic is tagged as `Supported` or `Maintained`, expect that
somebody reacts to review requests.
Change-Id: I9ee038dc5ee1f4993ba1d230ef6e737f20e2ff8a
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29471
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
This board doesn't support the newest RISC-V Privileged Architecture
spec (1.10), and it's based on an FPGA so it's a moving target.
Now that there's actual RISC-V silicon out there (from SiFive),
mb/lowrisc/nexys4ddr will only continue to bitrot.
Change-Id: I4e3e715106a1a94381a563dc4a56781c35883c2d
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28706
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
I sent out an email to all of the maintainers asking to verify their
status.
- The email I sent to Marcin Wojciechowski bounced, so I'm removing the
Little Plains mainboard support.
- I'm removing myself from areas that I'm not currently maintaining.
- Due to Damien's schedule, he asked that the level for his pieces be
changed from "Maintained" to "Odd Fixes".
I've added a list of infrastructure owners and backup owners - This is
strictly informational.
Change-Id: I39715611e8025bb535cdf1012be2bf05bf91fdaa
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20400
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Zammit <damien@zamaudio.com>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Update my email address for Apollolake and FSP 2.0 driver. Also
downgrade support from "supported" to "maintained" as currently
no other Intel persons are assigned for the role.
Change-Id: I3033fc5ec8b0882ce79eeb15ee3eb13a228611a4
Signed-off-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20550
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
The coreboot sites support HTTPS, and requests over HTTP with SSL are
also redirected. So use the more secure URLs, which also saves a
request most of the times, as nothing needs to be redirected.
Run the command below to replace all occurences.
```
$ git grep -l -E 'http://(www.|review.|)coreboot.org'
| xargs sed -i 's,http://\(.*\)coreboot.org,https://\1coreboot.org,g'
```
Change-Id: If53f8b66f1ac72fb1a38fa392b26eade9963c369
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20034
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
- Fix whitespace: Change some spaces to tabs
- Add myself as an abuild maintainer
- Add util/xcompile and util/genbuild_h to the BUILD SYSTEM section
- Add new sections for utilities: docker, toolchain, and git
- Remove GENERIC DRAM section
- Remove the mailing list. We don't want it to be added as a reviewer.
Change-Id: I78692fcac174d7b7c4d65911c85e4e2dacefcfc0
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18578
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Add Intel Broadwell-DE SOC and Camelback Mountain CRB to the list
Change-Id: I3f0c3ae8b38ecf3c3676fe497ade8b74ba94485d
Signed-off-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14382
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
If you want to be a maintainer Damien just add yourself to the list.
Change-Id: I15c646fc23d0804a8172da66d9297ab7977e6e6a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14157
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
After several internal discussions, teams at Intel with stakes in
coreboot have decided to each assign one or more maintainers. These
maintainers can be expected to provide a point of contact for
assistance with technical (code-related) issues, testing on real
hardware, and making sure that their FSP-related areas continue to
function with upstream coreboot.
They understand that the inclusion of their information in the
MAINTAINERS file does not give them any extra power over their areas.
At the same time, nobody expects any community process to change.
The one expectation is that reasonable efforts be made to contact
these maintainers when making fundamental changes to their areas, or
when discussing code removal.
Change-Id: I62b2eaec8270ac1fce5bfbee3b3da68aba116b0f
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <alexandrux.gagniuc@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/11894
Reviewed-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
After several internal discussions, teams at Intel with stakes in
coreboot have decided to each assign one or more maintainers. These
maintainers can be expected to provide a point of contact for
assistance with technical (code-related) issues, testing on real
hardware, and making sure that their FSP-related areas continue to
function with upstream coreboot.
They understand that the inclusion of their information in the
MAINTAINERS file does not give them any extra power over their areas.
At the same time, nobody expects any community process to change.
The one expectation is that reasonable efforts be made to contact
these maintainers when making fundamental changes to their areas, or
when discussing code removal.
Change-Id: I33d95db12d9e394360a207c8fbcfbc15723115c6
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Initial list of subsystems and the files that belong
to that subsystem, so we can define maintainers for them.
Change-Id: Icde0f387b486bea1bb63f9bbdf6330fa0a3ebcfa
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/10530
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
After several internal discussions, teams at Intel with stakes in
coreboot have decided to each assign one or more maintainers. These
maintainers can be expected to provide a point of contact for
assistance with technical (code-related) issues, testing on real
hardware, and making sure that their FSP-related areas continue to
function with upstream coreboot.
They understand that the inclusion of their information in the
MAINTAINERS file does not give them any extra power over their areas.
At the same time, nobody expects any community process to change.
The one expectation is that reasonable efforts be made to contact
these maintainers when making fundamental changes to their areas, or
when discussing code removal.
Change-Id: I7af7b37a5e3a233cc29adb20dd5bb8fa07dbdd53
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Guckian <david.guckian@intel.com>
