UefiCpuPkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__
__FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99. Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout UefiCpuPkg. Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com> Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
mergify[bot]
parent
1639b6bf07
commit
089013a697
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ InitUTContext (
|
||||
|
||||
Status = MpServicesUnitTestWhoAmI (LocalContext->MpServices, &BspNumber);
|
||||
UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: BspNumber = 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, BspNumber));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: BspNumber = 0x%x\n", __func__, BspNumber));
|
||||
|
||||
Status = MpServicesUnitTestGetNumberOfProcessors (
|
||||
LocalContext->MpServices,
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ InitUTContext (
|
||||
DEBUG ((
|
||||
DEBUG_INFO,
|
||||
"%a: NumberOfProcessors = 0x%x, NumberOfEnabledProcessors = 0x%x\n",
|
||||
__FUNCTION__,
|
||||
__func__,
|
||||
NumberOfProcessors,
|
||||
NumberOfEnabledProcessors
|
||||
));
|
||||
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ InitUTContext (
|
||||
LocalContext->DisabledApNumber[IndexOfDisabledAPs] = ProcessorNumber;
|
||||
IndexOfDisabledAPs++;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: AP(0x%x) is disabled and temporarily enable it.\n", __FUNCTION__, ProcessorNumber));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: AP(0x%x) is disabled and temporarily enable it.\n", __func__, ProcessorNumber));
|
||||
Status = MpServicesUnitTestEnableDisableAP (
|
||||
LocalContext->MpServices,
|
||||
ProcessorNumber,
|
||||
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ CheckUTContext (
|
||||
|
||||
if (BspNumber != LocalContext->BspNumber) {
|
||||
LocalContext->BspNumber = BspNumber;
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New BspNumber = 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, BspNumber));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New BspNumber = 0x%x\n", __func__, BspNumber));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT (BspNumber == LocalContext->BspNumber);
|
||||
@@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ CheckUTContext (
|
||||
|
||||
if (NumberOfProcessors != LocalContext->NumberOfProcessors) {
|
||||
LocalContext->NumberOfProcessors = NumberOfProcessors;
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New NumberOfProcessors = 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, NumberOfProcessors));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New NumberOfProcessors = 0x%x\n", __func__, NumberOfProcessors));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (NumberOfEnabledProcessors != LocalContext->NumberOfProcessors) {
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New NumberOfEnabledProcessors = 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, NumberOfEnabledProcessors));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: New NumberOfEnabledProcessors = 0x%x\n", __func__, NumberOfEnabledProcessors));
|
||||
|
||||
for (ProcessorNumber = 0; ProcessorNumber < LocalContext->NumberOfProcessors; ProcessorNumber++) {
|
||||
Status = MpServicesUnitTestGetProcessorInfo (
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ CheckUTContext (
|
||||
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT)) {
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: AP(0x%x) is disabled unexpectedly and reenable it.\n", __FUNCTION__, ProcessorNumber));
|
||||
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: AP(0x%x) is disabled unexpectedly and reenable it.\n", __func__, ProcessorNumber));
|
||||
Status = MpServicesUnitTestEnableDisableAP (
|
||||
LocalContext->MpServices,
|
||||
ProcessorNumber,
|
||||
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ FreeUTContext (
|
||||
DEBUG ((
|
||||
DEBUG_INFO,
|
||||
"%a: Disable AP(0x%x) to restore its state.\n",
|
||||
__FUNCTION__,
|
||||
__func__,
|
||||
LocalContext->DisabledApNumber[IndexOfDisabledAPs]
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user