Use on-demand paging for CpuSaveStates read/write. It was measured about 200us for either read or write the PI CpuSaveStates to framework, ~400us in total on a platform with 80 CPUs with original for loop implementation. So with on-demand paging, if the framework SMI handler doesn’t read/write CpuSaveStates, ~400us will be saved. If the handler happens to use CpuSaveStates, there will be about 20us overhead for either read or write a page which contains 5 continuous CpuSaveStates.
git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@10328 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This commit is contained in:
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
/** @file
|
||||
Page fault handler that does nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (c) 2010, Intel Corporation
|
||||
All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
|
||||
are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD License
|
||||
which accompanies this distribution. The full text of the license may be found at
|
||||
http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
|
||||
|
||||
THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS,
|
||||
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
|
||||
|
||||
**/
|
||||
|
||||
VOID
|
||||
PageFaultHandlerHook (
|
||||
VOID
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user