Currently OVMF tries to rely on the base size advertised via the CPUID
table entries corresponding to leaf 0xD, sub-leafs 0x0/0x1. This will
generally work for KVM guests, but might not for other SEV-SNP
hypervisor implementations. Make the handling more robust by simply
using the base area size documented by the APM.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
CPUID leaf 0xD sub-leafs 0x0 and 0x1 contain cumulative sizes for the
enabled XSave areas. Those sizes are calculated by tallying up all the
other sub-leafs that contain per-area size information for XSave areas
that are currently enabled in XCr0/XSS. The current check has the logic
inverted. Fix that.
This doesn't seem to cause problems currently, but could in the future
if OVMF made more extensive use of XSave areas. It was noticed while
implementing SNP-related tests for KVM Unit Tests, which re-uses the
OVMF #VC handler in some cases.
Reported-by: Pavan Kumar Paluri <papaluri@amd.com>
Cc: Pavan Kumar Paluri <papaluri@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
__FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among
others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99.
Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout
OvmfPkg.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
According to the Intel GHCI specification document section 2.4.1, the
goal for instructions that do not have a corresponding TDCALL is for the
handler to treat the instruction as a NOP.
INVD does not have a corresponding TDCALL. This patch makes the #VE
handler treat INVD as a NOP.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
