This patch removes the unnecessary alignment check on microcode patch
TotalSize introduced by commit d786a172. The TotalSize has already been
checked with 1K alignment and MAX_ADDRESS in previous code as below:
if ( (UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize) ||
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd ||
(DataSize & 0x3) != 0 ||
(TotalSize & (SIZE_1KB - 1)) != 0 ||
TotalSize < DataSize
) {
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Previous commits have introduced below fields in structure CPU_AP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT8 PlatformId;
UINT64 MicrocodeEntryAddr;
which store the information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. Detected microcode patch entry address (including the microcode patch
header)
for each processor within system.
Therefore, the below fields in structure CPU_MP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT32 ProcessorFlags;
UINT64 MicrocodeDataAddress;
UINT32 MicrocodeRevision;
which store the BSP's information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. The address and revision of detected microcode patch
are redundant and can be removed.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429
This commit will attempt to reduce the copy size when loading the
microcode patches data from flash into memory.
Such optimization is done by a pre-process of the microcode patch headers
(on flash). A microcode patch will be loaded into memory only when the
below 3 criteria are met:
A. With a microcode patch header (which means the data is not padding data
between microcode patches);
B. The 'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlags' fields in the header match
at least one processor within system;
C. If the Extended Signature Table exists in a microcode patch, the
'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlag' fields in the table entries
match at least one processor within system.
Criterion B and C will require all the processors to be woken up once to
collect their CPUID and Platform ID information. Hence, this commit will
move the copy, detect and apply of microcode patch on BSP and APs after
all the processors have been woken up.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934
0x0 MicrocodeBegin MicrocodeEntry MicrocodeEnd 0xffffffff
|--------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
valid TotalSize
TotalSize is only valid between 0 and (MicrocodeEnd - MicrocodeEntry).
So add '(UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize)' before
'((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd' to make sure
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) wouldn't overflow.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The Microcode region indicated by MicrocodePatchAddress PCD may contain
more than one Microcode entry. We should save InCompleteCheckSum32 value
for each payload. Move the logic for calculate InCompleteCheckSum32 from
the outsize of the do-while loop to the inside.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The following Microcode payload format is define in SDM spec.
Payload: |MicrocodeHeader|MicrocodeBinary|ExtendedHeader|ExtendedTable|.
When we verify the CheckSum32 with ExtendedTable, we should use the fields
of ExtendedTable to replace corresponding fields in MicrocodeHeader,
and then calculate the CheckSum32 with MicrocodeHeader+MicrocodeBinary.
This patch already verified on ICL platform.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Search uCode costs much time, if AP has same processor type
with BSP, AP can use BSP saved uCode info to get better performance.
This change enables this solution.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
MicrocodeDetect function will run by every threads, and it will
use PcdGet to get PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and
PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize, if change both PCD default to dynamic,
system will in non-deterministic behavior.
By design, UEFI/PI services are single threaded and not re-entrant
so Multi processor code should not use UEFI/PI services. Here, Pcd
protocol/PPI is used to access dynamic PCDs so it would result in
non-deterministic behavior.
This code get PCD value in BSP and save them in CPU_MP_DATA for Ap.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726
Cc: Crystal Lee <CrystalLee@ami.com.tw>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
