Add support for allocating aligned pages at an alignment higher
than 4K. The new function allocated memory taking into account
the padding required and then frees up unused pages before mapping
it.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Singhal <ashishsingha@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
While allocating pages aligned at an alignment higher than
4K, allocate memory taking into consideration the padding
required for that alignment. The calls to free pages takes
care of this already.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Singhal <ashishsingha@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266
Commit 2de1f611be introduced a regression
whereas platforms that did set PcdPlatformBootTimeOut to 0 are now getting
an unexpected call to PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback().
This patch also ensures that, if PcdPlatformBootTimeOut is 0xFFFF we don't
call PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback() with a zero argument as doing so
would produce an unwarranted jump to full progress completion which is
likely to throw off users.
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The BootScriptInsert() and BootScriptLabel() functions take the in/out
parameter "Position" as (EFI_S3_BOOT_SCRIPT_POSITION*), and pass it to
S3BootScriptMoveLastOpcode() and S3BootScriptLabel(), respectively.
The callees take the in/out parameter "Position" as (VOID**). Add explicit
casts for clarity.
There is no change in functionality.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The SmiHandlerRegister() function explicitly casts "SmiHandler" (of type
(SMI_HANDLER*)) to EFI_HANDLE, when outputting "DispatchHandle".
Apply the same cast in the counterpart function SmiHandlerUnRegister(),
which compares multiple "SmiHandler"s against the input "DispatchHandle".
This is a semantic cleanup; there is no functional change.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Unlike the InstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service, which takes
an (EFI_HANDLE*) as first parameter, the
UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service takes an EFI_HANDLE as
first parameter.
These are actual bugs. They must have remained hidden until now because
they are on error paths. Fix the UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces()
calls.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Clean up two issues around FindFileEx():
- The "AprioriFile" parameter's type differs between the function
declaration and the function definition. The correct type is
(EFI_PEI_FILE_HANDLE*).
- "FfsFileHeader" has type (EFI_FFS_FILE_HEADER*); for clarity, we should
cast it explicitly to EFI_PEI_FILE_HANDLE when assigning it to
(*AprioriFile).
This is a semantic cleanup, there is no functional change.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The PI spec (v1.7) correctly specifies "EFI_RUNTIME_EVENT_ENTRY.Event" in
natural language, but the field type in the structure definition itself is
wrong -- it should be EFI_EVENT, not (EFI_EVENT*).
This spec bug is likely unfixable for compatibility reasons, and so edk2
works it around already. We should clearly document the workaround.
Functionally, this patch is a no-op.
(I've also requested a non-normative (informative) clarification for the
PI spec: <https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=2017>.)
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The HiiConstructConfigHdr() function takes the "DriverHandle" parameter in
order to fetch the device path from it, and then turn the device path into
PATH routing information.
The HiiConstructConfigHdr() function is called from
VariableCleanupHiiExtractConfig(), which is only installed when "Type" is
"VarCleanupManually" in PlatformVarCleanup().
In that case, we create "Private->DriverHandle" as a new handle, and
install "mVarCleanupHiiVendorDevicePath" on it. Then we pass
"Private->DriverHandle" to HiiAddPackages(), which consumes the device
path for routing purposes.
It follows that the "DriverHandle" argument passed to
HiiConstructConfigHdr() should be the same driver handle, for matching
routing.
Currently we pass "Private->HiiHandle", which is clearly a typo, because
it is the return value of HiiAddPackages(), and stands for the published
HII package list.
Therefore this patch addresses an actual bug.
The typo has not been flagged by compilers because the UEFI spec
regrettably defines both EFI_HANDLE and EFI_HII_HANDLE as (VOID*).
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
EfiCreateProtocolNotifyEvent() takes a (VOID**) for "Registration",
similarly to gBS->RegisterProtocolNotify(). We should pass the address of
an actual pointer-to-VOID, and not the address of an EFI_EVENT. EFI_EVENT
just happens to be specified as (VOID*), and has nothing to do with the
registration.
The same applies to gMmst->MmRegisterProtocolNotify().
"mFtwRegistration", "mFvRegistration", and "mFvbRegistration" are used for
nothing else.
This change is a no-op in practice; it's a semantic improvement.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
GetModuleInfoFromHandle() takes an EFI_HANDLE -- (VOID*) -- as first
parameter, but InsertFpdtRecord() passes (EFI_HANDLE*) -- (VOID**).
(VOID**) converts silently to (VOID*), which is why the wrong cast is
masked.
Note that the *value* that is passed is alright -- therefore this patch
does not change behavior --, it's just semantically wrong to pass an
(EFI_HANDLE*) where an EFI_HANDLE is expected.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The existing loop is set to call PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback every
second except the last one. We believe this is a mistake as it prevents
the called code from performing timeout expiration tasks such as, for
instance, ensuring that the last segment of a progress bar is displayed
before continuing (which is a current issue for the RPi3 platform).
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218
There is a bug in current driver code that makes
it impossible for it to work with devices that
only work in legacy speed mode since the function
EmmcSwitchToHighSpeed will return with EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER
for such bus mode. Since the logic in that function will
work well for SdMmcMmcLegacy this patch just allows
to call this function with SdMmcMmcLegacy bus mode.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Albecki <mateusz.albecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218
SD specification recommends switching card bus timing before
switching bus timing in controller. Emmc driver used to do
this switch other way around. This commit adds controller
timing switch in EmmcSwitchBusTiming function to enforce this
order and removes all controller timing programming from
EmmcSwitchToXXX functions.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Albecki <mateusz.albecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218
Stopping the SD clock before switching host controller
bus timing is only necessary if preset value enable is
set in host controller. Code that performs switch to
HS200 doesn't check this condition right now and we also
don't do the SD clock stop before any other bus timing switch
in host controller. Since the driver is generally not ready to support
host controller with preset value enable set we removed this
code.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Albecki <mateusz.albecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
There is no sourceX offset in case when
Configure->PixelFormat == PixelBlueGreenRedReserved8BitPerColor.
We are copying most left pixels instead of copying required rectangle.
Signed-off-by: Gris87 <Gris87@yandex.ru>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the caller in PlatformDriOverrideDxe which don't have the policy to
defer the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
The Fpdt driver (FirmwarePerformanceDxe) saves a memory address across
reboots, and then does an AllocatePage for that memory address.
If, on this boot, that memory comes from a Runtime memory bucket,
the MAT table is not updated. This causes Windows to boot into Recovery.
This patch blocks the memory manager from changing the page
from a special bucket to a different memory type. Once the buckets are
allocated, we freeze the memory ranges for the OS, and fragmenting
the special buckets will cause errors resuming from hibernate (S4).
The references to S4 here are the use case that fails. This
failure is root caused to an inconsistent behavior of the
core memory services themselves when type AllocateAddress is used.
The main issue is apparently with the UEFI memory map -- the UEFI memory
map reflects the pre-allocated bins, but the actual allocations at fixed
addresses may go out of sync with that. Everything else, such as:
- EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE (page protections) being out of sync,
- S4 failing
are just symptoms / consequences.
This patch is cherry pick from Project Mu:
a9be767d9b
With the minor change,
1. Update commit message format to keep the message in 80 characters one line.
2. Remove // MU_CHANGE comments in source code.
3. Update comments style to follow edk2 style.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Initialize PageMapLevel5Entry at the beginning of the function.
This commit will fix a GCC 4.8.5 build failure introduced by commit
b3527dedc3.
OvmfPkg build failure wtih gcc 4.8.5 still exists at latest edk2 version.
The commit 46f8a68916 seems not to fix
the build failure completely.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
This commit will fix a GCC 4.8.5 build failure introduced by commit
b3527dedc3.
PageMapLevel5Entry may be uninitialized in original code, which means
uninitialized pointer will be modified at some circumstance.
So relocate the operation of PageMapLevel5Entry++ in order to make sure
the pointer could be modified only when it is initialized.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
