Currently, "push byte %[Vector]" causes nasm warning when Vector is larger
than 0x7F. This is because push accepts a signed value, and byte means
signed int8. Maximum signed int8 is 0x7F.
When Vector is larger the 0x7F, for example, when Vector is 255, byte 255
turns to -1, and causes the warning "signed byte value exceeds".
To avoid such warning, use dword instead of byte, this will increase 3 bytes
for each IdtVector.
For IA32, the size of IdtVector will increase from 10 bytes to 13 bytes.
For X64, the size of IdtVector will increase from 15 bytes to 18 bytes.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Today the DXE instance allocates code page and then copies the IDT
vectors to the allocated code page. Then it fixes up the vector number
in the IDT vector.
But if we update the NASM file to generate 256 IDT vectors, there is
no need to do the copy and fix-up.
A side effect is 4096 bytes (HOOKAFTER_STUB_SIZE * 256) is used for
256 IDT vectors while 32 IDT vectors only require 512 bytes without
this change, in following library instances:
1. 32bit SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib and PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib
2. 64bit PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib
But considering the code logic simplification, 3.5K extra space is
not a big deal.
If 3.5K is too much, we can enhance the code further to generate 32
vectors for above mentioned library instances.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
When enter SMM exception, there will be a stack switch only if the IST
field of the interrupt gate is set. When CET shadow stack feature is
enabled, if there is a stack switch between SMM exception and SMM, the
shadow stack token busy bit needs to be cleared when return from SMM
exception to SMM. In UEFI BIOS, only page fault exception does the stack
swith when SMM shack guard feature is enabled. The condition of clear
shadow stack token busy bit should be SMM stack guard enabled, CET shadows
stack feature enabled and page fault exception.
The shadow stack token should be initialized by UINT64.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3462
Signed-off-by: Sheng Wei <w.sheng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Qihua Zhuang <qihua.zhuang@intel.com>
Cc: Daquan Dong <daquan.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Justin Tong <justin.tong@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Xu <tom.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
If CET shadows stack feature enabled in SMM and stack switch is enabled.
When code execute from SMM handler to SMM exception, CPU will check SMM
exception shadow stack token busy bit if it is cleared or not.
If it is set, it will trigger #DF exception.
If it is not set, CPU will set the busy bit when enter SMM exception.
So, the busy bit should be cleared when return back form SMM exception to
SMM handler. Otherwise, keeping busy bit 1 will cause to trigger #DF
exception when enter SMM exception next time.
So, we use instruction SAVEPREVSSP, CLRSSBSY and RSTORSSP to clear the
shadow stack token busy bit before RETF instruction in SMM exception.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3192
Signed-off-by: Sheng Wei <w.sheng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Roger Feng <roger.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
Add base support to handle #VC exceptions. Update the common exception
handlers to invoke the VmgExitHandleVc () function of the VmgExitLib
library when a #VC is encountered. A non-zero return code will propagate
to the targeted exception handler.
Under SEV-ES, a DR7 read or write intercept generates a #VC exception.
To avoid exception recursion, a #VC exception will not try to read and
push the actual debug registers into the EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64 struct
and instead push zeroes. The #VC exception handler does not make use of
the debug registers from the saved context and the exception processing
exit code does not attempt to restore the debug register values.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
