There is no sourceX offset in case when
Configure->PixelFormat == PixelBlueGreenRedReserved8BitPerColor.
We are copying most left pixels instead of copying required rectangle.
Signed-off-by: Gris87 <Gris87@yandex.ru>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in ShellPkg which don't have the policy to defer the
execution of the image.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the caller in PlatformDriOverrideDxe which don't have the policy to
defer the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in EmbeddedPkg which don't have the policy to defer the
execution of the image.
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2182
Inorder to support VS2019, we add VS2019 config process
in Setup Batch Files,
Because VS2019 and VS2017 could using same vswhere.exe
to detect the InstallationPath,
So we add the -version as the parameter of vswhere
to get the correct VS2017/VS2019's InstallationPath
v3: In BaseTools\set_vsprefix_envs.bat,
move WINSDK10_PREFIX setting into VCToolsInstallDir check condition.
Cc: Amy Chan <amy.chan@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ching JenX Cheng <ching.jenx.cheng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
This reverts commit bc9e4194cf.
This change causes the dependent header files are missing in Makefile.
It makes the incremental build not work. So, revert this change.
Cc: Bob Feng<bob.c.feng@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng<bob.c.feng@Intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
v4:
The v3 posting didn't do what it promised to do, so do it now for real.
V3 changes:
change to mov instruction (non locking instuction) instead
of xchg to simplify design.
V2 changes:
Add xchg 16 bit instructions to handle sgdt and sidt base
63:48 bits and 47:32 bits.
Add comment to explain why xchg 64bit isnt being used
Split lock happens when a locking instruction is used on mis-aligned data
that crosses two cachelines. If close source platform enables Alignment
Check Exception(#AC), They can hit a double fault due to split lock being
in CpuExceptionHandlerLib.
sigt and sgdt saves 10 bytes to memory, 8 bytes is base and 2 bytes is limit.
The data is mis-aligned, can cross two cacheline, and a xchg
instruction(locking instuction) is being utilize.
Signed-off-by: John E Lofgren <john.e.lofgren@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Due to needs a tackling the deficiency of the AP API, it's necessary to
ensure that in non-blocking mode previous AP executed command is
finished before starting new one.
To remedy above:
1) execute AcquireSpinLock instead AcquireSpinLockOrFail - this will
ensure time "window" to eliminate potential race condition between
BSP and AP spinLock release in non-blocking mode.
This also will eliminate possibility to start executing new AP
function before last is finished.
2) remove returns EFI_STATUS - EFI_NOT_READY - in new scenario returned
status is not necessary to caller.
Signed-off-by: Damian Nikodem <damian.nikodem@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Benjamin You <benjamin.you@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Rusocki <krzysztof.rusocki@intel.com>
BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2201
An error occurs using special VpdPcd that is not used in the Inf file
In dsc:
[PcdsDynamicExVpd.common.DEFAULT]
gBoardModuleTokenSpaceGuid.test1|*|{CODE({
{0x0} // terminator
})}
In dec:
[PcdsDynamicEx]
# Vpd GPIO table
gBoardModuleTokenSpaceGuid.test1|{0}|GPIO_INIT_CONFIG[]|0x50000018 {
<HeaderFiles>
Library/GpioLib.h
<Packages>
MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
}
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 0: '*'
This Patch is going to fix issue
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiju.Fan <zhijux.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
The StandaloneMmPkg .DSC file went out of sync with the changes
applied to the package when I enabled this code on the Synquacer
platform in edk2-platforms. So apply the necessary changes to make
this package build in isolation.
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Build-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2188
build -p MdeModulePkg\MdeModulePkg.dsc -a IA32 -m
MdeModulePkg\Universal\PCD\Pei\Pcd.inf
Error:
AttributeError: 'PlatformInfo' object has no attribute
'DynamicPcdList'
The DSC data object used to build a separate module today
is PlatformInfo rather than PlatformAutoGen
'PlatformAutoGen' object has attribute 'DynamicPcdList'
This patch is going to fixed this issue
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiju.Fan <zhijux.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
The header files are used but missing in INF, which causes
warning message when building them.
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
After upgrading the CI system we use for building the ArmVirtPkg
targets, we started seeing failures due to the NOOPT build running
out of space when using the CLANG38 toolchain definition combined
with clang 7.
We really don't want to increase the FD/FV sizes in general to
accommodate this, so parameterize the relevant quantities and
increase them by 50% for NOOPT builds.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Today's behavior is to enable 5l paging when CPU supports it
(CPUID[7,0].ECX.BIT[16] is set).
The patch changes the behavior to enable 5l paging when two
conditions are both met:
1. CPU supports it;
2. The max physical address bits is bigger than 48.
Because 4-level paging can support to address physical address up to
2^48 - 1, there is no need to enable 5-level paging with max
physical address bits <= 48.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
When building BaseTools, GNUmakefile builds create directory
BaseTools/Source/C/libs/. On the other hand, Makefile builds use libs
as an nmake pseudo target, so it either must NOT exist as a file or
directory, OR it must phony dependency like .PHONY. The latter
solution conflicts with NmakeSubdirs.py. Therefore, I make it go away
in the cleanall target. I could also add it to the clean target, but
it strikes me that cleanall should be more forceful.
Signed-off-by: Burt Silverman <burtms@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
