Use a pool allocation for the RSDP ACPI root pointer structure if no
memory limit is in effect that forces us to use page based allocation,
which may be wasteful if they get rounded up to 64 KB as is the case
on AArch64.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
If no memory allocation limit is in effect for ACPI tables, prefer
pool allocations over page allocations, to avoid wasting memory on
systems where page based allocations are rounded up to 64 KB, such
as AArch64.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
On AArch64 systems, page based allocations for memory types that are
relevant to the OS are rounded up to 64 KB multiples. This wastes
some space in the ACPI table memory allocator, since it uses page
based allocations in order to be able to place the ACPI tables low
in memory.
Since the latter requirement does not exist on AArch64, switch to pool
allocations for all ACPI tables except the root tables if the active
allocation policy permits them to be anywhere in memory. The root
tables will be handled in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
This reverts commit e0eacd7daa.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3012
The patch to fix LBA size would cause a regression that make the
partition of CD image with media type other than NO_EMULATOR unobserved.
The patch used to fix the CD image's MBR table issue. The CD MBR
table would always be ignored because it would be handled by the
Eltorito partition handler first and never go into the MBR handler.
So directly revert it.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Update function behavior to not modify the incoming string that is
marked as CONST in the prototype.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2823
Refer to UEFI spec 2.8, Section 13.3.2, a block device should
be scanned as below order:
1. GPT
2. ISO 9660 (El Torito) (UDF should aslo be here)
3. MBR
4. no partition found
Note: UDF is using the same boot method as CD, so put it in
the same priority with ISO 9660.
This would also solve the issue that ISO image with MBR would
be treat as MBR device instead of CD/DVD. That would make the
behavior of the image boot different:
If the CD/DVD's MBR be handled correctly, it would be enumerated
as a bootable device with MBR path and FAT filesystem. Some Linux
Distributions boot from such path (FAT with MBR path for ISO) would
come into the grub console instead of the installation selection.
With this change, the CD/DVD would always be enumerated with CD path.
And it would always boot to the installation selection.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2823
The partition binding driver would run serval times during BDS.
If the partition support MBR, it would pass the first connection
in MBR partition child handler. The second connect for the same
device would return already started which would be treated as
not found. And it would continue to run next partition child
handler check. That is incorrect behavior to do next check if one
of the routine functions is passed. It may cause one device
installed serval partition child handle on it.
So treat the EFI_ALREADY_STARTED as EFI_SUCCESS to avoid incorrect
next partition child handle check.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2823
Refer to
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man8/mkudffs.8.html.
Some Linux ISOs may have the MBR table for compatibility reasons
for Windows. The MBR tale would contain the partition entry with
start LBA0 and whole media size. There are two methods to check
the filesystem in the CD-ROM:
1. MBR partition check (Windows)
2. Whole disk check (MAC OS)
UEFI doesn't have the MBR check for UDF and Eltorito. But it may
pass the MBR check for such table and fail to detect the filesystem
of UDF. Skip the MBR check if the MBR is added for Windows
compatiblity so that the partition driver can continue UDF and
ElTorito check.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2823
PartitionValidMbr function's second parameter should be the
last sector of the device. For MBR partition, the block size is
sector size, i.e. 512 bytes. The original value is media block
last LBA which is counted by the media block size. And media
block size is not always 512 bytes, it may be larger which would
cause the MBR boundary check incorrect. The boundary check is
based on the partition entry start LBA and size of LBA which
are both counted by the sector number (512 bytes).
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2844
Update Reclaim() to return the error status from the reclaim
operation and not the status of SynchronizeRuntimeVariableCache()
that can be EFI_SUCCESS even through the status from reclaim
is an error. Without this change, the return status from
SetVariable() can be EFI_SUCCESS even though the variable was
not actually set. This occurs if the variable store is full
and a Reclaim() is invoked to free up space and even after all
possible space is freed, there is still not enough room for
the variable being set. This condition should return
EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2786
In order to support enable/disable report status code through memory
or serial dynamic, change the following PCDs from [PcdsFeatureFlag] to
[PcdsFixedAtBuild, PcdsPatchableInModule, PcdsDynamic, PcdsDynamicEx]:
PcdStatusCodeUseSerial
PcdStatusCodeUseMemory
The original plaforms can use PcdsFixedAtBuild in .dsc files to save size.
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Tan <ming.tan@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2701
Recording to the spec, the reconnect is activated upon exiting of the
formset or the browser. Exiting is by user but form-browser internal
logic. That means the reconnection is only happened when user press
ESC or _EXIT action to exit form.
Driver callback may update HII form dynamically so form-browser needs
to refresh its internal data. It's not exiting formset for user
exactly and they didn't know what happened. So use a flag to record
that and do not reconnect driver if updated by callback.
Signed-off-by: Walon Li <walon.li@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
OnigurumaIntrinsics.c is now not used. So the implement of function
'memcpy' is now not., which causes build failure with CLANG9 and
XCODE. I remove OnigurumaIntrinsics.c and move the necessary function
implement to OnigurumaUefiPort.c/h.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2665
ReportDispatcher() is called by a software module to report a status code.
The interface is generic and can be called frequently throughout the boot
under various conditions. A certain set of conditions can cause the
currently implemented algorithm for resource exhaustion to fail. A sample
scenario:
1. ReportStatusCode() is called at a TPL higher than one of the registered
status code listeners making the call to the listener deferred until
TPL is lowered.
2. Additional calls to ReportStatusCode() occur, so the data buffer
continues to expand.
3. A call to ReportStatusCode() is made from within a memory allocation
call (e.g. CoreAllocatePoolPages ()) which is protected from re-
entrancy with mPoolMemoryLock. This will cause the ReallocatePool()
call in ReportDispatcher() to fail. Because the end pointer was already
moved to account for the data size, the end pointer is now moved
beyond the buffer and invalid.
This commit saves the original end pointer value into a local variable
called "FailSafeEndPointer" which tracks a safe end pointer to revert to
in the case the allocated buffer size (CallbackEntry->EndPointer -
CallbackEntry->StatusCodeDataBuffer) is still not large enough for the
data.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kun Qin <Kun.Qin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2062
This commit makes the behavior for PeiGetVariable() match the following
specification-defined behavior. It is now consistent with the DXE/SMM
variable driver implementation.
The UEFI specification v2.8 Errata A Section 8.2 "GetVariable()"
"Attributes" parameter description states:
"If not NULL, a pointer to the memory location to return the
attributes bitmask for the variable. See 'Related Definitions.'
If not NULL, then Attributes is set on output both when
EFI_SUCCESS and when EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL is returned."
The attributes were previously only returned from the implementation
in Variable.c on EFI_SUCCESS. They are now returned on EFI_SUCCESS or
EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL according to spec.
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2062
The UEFI specification v2.8 Errata A Section 8.2 "GetVariable()"
"Attributes" parameter description states:
"If not NULL, a pointer to the memory location to return the
attributes bitmask for the variable. See 'Related Definitions.'
If not NULL, then Attributes is set on output both when
EFI_SUCCESS and when EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL is returned."
The attributes were previously only returned from the implementation
in Variable.c on EFI_SUCCESS. They are now returned on EFI_SUCCESS or
EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL according to spec.
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
From the function description of GetIfrBinaryData(), FormSetGuid can be
NULL. However, FormSetGuid is passed to IsZeroGuid(). This causes exception
when FormSetGuid is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Nickle Wang <nickle.wang@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Current UpdateCapsule service will reject all non-reset capsule images and
return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCE if the system is at runtime. This will block a
platform CapsuleLib from implementing ProcessCapsuleImage() with runtime
capsule processing capability.
This patch removes this restriction. The change is controled by a feature
PCD PcdSupportProcessCapsuleAtRuntime, and the default value is FALSE
which means not enable this feature.
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2501
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2457
This commit fixes an offset calculation that is used to write the
VarErrorFlag UEFI variable to the UEFI variable runtime cache.
Currently a physical address is used instead of an offset. This
commit changes the offset to zero with a length of the entire
non-volatile variable store so the entire non-volatile variable
store buffer in SMRAM (with the variable update modification) is
copied to the runtime variable cache. This follows the same pattern
used in other SynchronizeRuntimeVariableCache () calls for
consistency.
* Observable symptom: An exception in SMM will most likely occur
due to the invalid memory reference when the VarErrorFlag variable
is written. The variable is most commonly written when the UEFI
variable store is full.
* The issue only occurs when the variable runtime cache is enabled
by the following PCD being set to TRUE:
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdEnableVariableRuntimeCache
Fixes: aab3b9b9a1
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <michael.turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2333
During a SetVariable () invocation, UpdateVariable () is called.
UpdateVariable () contains logic to determine whether a volatile or
non-volatile UEFI variable was set so the corresponding runtime
cache can be updated to reflect the change. The current logic simply
evaluates Variable->Volatile to determine which runtime cache should
be updated.
The problem is Variable->Volatile does not always reflect whether a
volatile variable is being set. Variable->Volatile is set to TRUE
only in the case a pre-existing variable is found in the volatile
variable store. Therefore, the value is FALSE when a new volatile
variable is written.
This change updates the logic to take this into account. If a new
variable is written successfully, the Attributes will accurately
reflect whether the variable is non-volatile. If a pre-existing
variable is modified, the Volatile field will reflect the type of
variable (Attributes are not reliable; e.g. 0x0 indicates deletion).
* Observable symptom: A volatile variable that was set successfully
might return EFI_NOT_FOUND when the variable should be found.
* The issue is a regression introduced to the variable services only
when the variable runtime cache is enabled by the following PCD
being set to TRUE:
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdEnableVariableRuntimeCache
* The issue was implemented in commit aab3b9b9a1 but the PCD was not
set to TRUE by default enabling the issue until commit e07b7d024a.
Fixes: aab3b9b9a1
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
