Foreground and background color are saved in a single byte.
Bits 0..3 are the foreground color and bits 4..6 are the background color.
If the Private->Attribute defined correctly, (Private->Attribute >> 4)
must be less than 8.
This commit uses ASSERT to assume "Attribute >> 4" is less than 8.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
IndexTable->Length is used as index in array IndexTable->Index[].
So IndexTable->Length needs to be checked, which should be less than
the array size.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
For now, PlatformRecovery doesn't work if OsIndications variable
doesn't exist, which is wrong.
According to the UEFI specification section 3.4.1 and 3.4.2, if
processing of BootOrder does not result in success, the OsRecovery
and PlatformRecovery options should still be processed regardless of
the existence of the OsIndications variable.
Therefore, update the code to check PcdPlatformRecoverySupport instead
of the value of OsIndications variable (PlatformRecovery) to fix
this issue.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Walon Li <walon.li@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Sunny Wang <sunnywang@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266
Commit 2de1f611be introduced a regression
whereas platforms that did set PcdPlatformBootTimeOut to 0 are now getting
an unexpected call to PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback().
This patch also ensures that, if PcdPlatformBootTimeOut is 0xFFFF we don't
call PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback() with a zero argument as doing so
would produce an unwarranted jump to full progress completion which is
likely to throw off users.
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The BootScriptInsert() and BootScriptLabel() functions take the in/out
parameter "Position" as (EFI_S3_BOOT_SCRIPT_POSITION*), and pass it to
S3BootScriptMoveLastOpcode() and S3BootScriptLabel(), respectively.
The callees take the in/out parameter "Position" as (VOID**). Add explicit
casts for clarity.
There is no change in functionality.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
EfiCreateProtocolNotifyEvent() takes a (VOID**) for "Registration",
similarly to gBS->RegisterProtocolNotify(). We should pass the address of
an actual pointer-to-VOID, and not the address of an EFI_EVENT. EFI_EVENT
just happens to be specified as (VOID*), and has nothing to do with the
registration.
The same applies to gMmst->MmRegisterProtocolNotify().
"mFtwRegistration", "mFvRegistration", and "mFvbRegistration" are used for
nothing else.
This change is a no-op in practice; it's a semantic improvement.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
The existing loop is set to call PlatformBootManagerWaitCallback every
second except the last one. We believe this is a mistake as it prevents
the called code from performing timeout expiration tasks such as, for
instance, ensuring that the last segment of a progress bar is displayed
before continuing (which is a current issue for the RPi3 platform).
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the caller in PlatformDriOverrideDxe which don't have the policy to
defer the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1525
The patch is to merge multiple FMP instances into single ESRT entry
when they have the same GUID.
The policy to LastAttemptStatus/LastAttemptVersion of ESRT entry is:
If all the LastAttemptStatus are LAST_ATTEMPT_STATUS_SUCCESS, then
LastAttemptVersion should be the smallest of LastAttemptVersion. If
any of the LastAttemptStatus is not LAST_ATTEMPT_STATUS_SUCCESS,
then the LastAttemptVersion/LastAttemptStatus should be the values
of the first FMP instance whose LastAttemptStatus is not
LAST_ATTEMPT_STATUS_SUCCESS.
To detect possible duplicated GUID/HardwareInstance, a table of
GUID/HardwareInstance pairs from all the EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_DESCRIPTORs
from all FMP instances is built. If a duplicate is found, then generate
a DEBUG_ERROR message, generate an ASSERT(), and ignore the duplicate
EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_DESCRIPTOR.
Add an internal worker function called FmpGetFirmwareImageDescriptor()
that retrieves the list of EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_DESCRIPTORs from a single
FMP instance and returns the descriptors in an allocated buffer. This
function is used to get the descriptors used to build the table of
unique GUID/HardwareInstance pairs. It is then used again to generate
the ESRT Table from all the EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_DESCRIPTORs from all the
FMP instances. 2 passes are performed so the total number of
descriptors is known. This allows the correct sized buffers to always
be allocated.
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
Use the PcdPlatformRecoverySupport to control the function
of platform recovery in BDS.
First, set the variable's ("OsIndicationsSupported")
EFI_OS_INDICATIONS_START_PLATFORM_RECOVERY bit base on the pcd.
It would affect the variable "OsIndications".
While the platform does not support the platform recovery,
it is inappropriate to set a PlatformRecovery#### variable. So
skip setting the variable. But it should remain the behavior of
booting from a default file path (such as \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI)
to be compatible with the previous version UEFI spec.
Add memory check before build platform default boot option. If
fail to allocate memory for the defualt boot file path, put the
system into dead loop to indicate it is unable to boot.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <Michael.Turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412
Original logic:
Connect the graphics device -> connect it as graphics consoles
and initialize its parameters(Mode = -1, invalid) -> connect it
as console spliter and add the device to the list(use SetMode to
set mode to the user defined mode or the best mode the devices
supported if the mode is invalid. *clear the screen at this phase*)
Changed logic:
Connect the graphics device -> connect it as graphics consoles
and initialize its parameters(initialize the mode to the user
defined mode or the best mode. *directly set the mode value without
using SetMode, that would not clear the screen) -> connect it as
console spliter and add the device to the list(use SetMode to set
mode to the user defined mode or the best mode the devices supported
if the mode is invalid. *now the mode is already set, so it would
not clear the screen*).
Also remove the section of SetMode for debug version.
Impact: as the text mode may not be an invalid value, the SetMode
may have no chance to be called during reconnect the graphics device.
That means the screen may not be cleaned after finishing reconnect
operation. There is one common condition: shell command "recoonect -r".
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <Michael.Turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
DEPEX from PEI storage stack.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777
BootInRecoveryMode Ppi dependency should be removed from PEI storage stack
drivers. Besides recovery, more features are using the storage stack.
Platform can apply Ppi dependency in Recovery FV which contains full
storage driver stack. Platform storage stack modules, such as host
controller init PEI module, should also remove this dependency.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
