Currently, there are multiple instances of code create image
records. ImagePropertiesRecordLib was created to only have
this code in one place. Update the lib to use additional
logic from the copy in MemoryProtection.c before converging
that code to use the lib.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
When an ImageRecord is stored by ImagePropertiesRecordLib, it reports the
CodeSegmentSize as the SizeOfRawData from the image. However, the image
as loaded into memory is aligned to the SectionAlignment, so
SizeOfRawData is under the actual size in memory. This is important,
because the memory attributes table uses these image records to create
its entries and it will report that the alignment of an image is
incorrect, even though the actual image is correct.
This was discovered on ARM64, which has a 64k runtime page granularity
alignment, which is backed by a 64k section alignment for
DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVERs. The runtime code and data was correctly being
loaded into memory, however the memory attribute table was incorrectly
reporting misaligned ranges to the OS, causing attributes to be
ignored for these sections for OSes using greater than 4k pages.
This patch correctly aligns the CodeSegmentSize to the SectionAlignment
and the corresponding memory attribute table entries are now correctly
aligned and pointing to the right places in memory.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Marvin H?user <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Update function headers to clarify the contract of each function and
improve readability. Add NULL checks to all functions that take a
pointer as an argument. Add return status to functions that
may need to return early due to invalid input.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
SplitRecord() does not handle the case where a memory descriptor
describes an image region plus extra pages before or after the
image region. This patch fixes this case by carving off the
unrelated regions into their own descriptors.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|4K PAGE|DATA|CODE|DATA|CODE|DATA|4K PAGE|
Say the above memory region is currently one memory map descriptor.
The above image memory layout example contains two code sections
oriented in a way that maximizes the number of descriptors which
would be required to describe each section.
NOTE: It's unlikely that a data section would ever be between
two code sections, but it's still handled by the below formula
for correctness.
There are two code sections (let's say CodeSegmentMax == 2),
three data sections, and two unrelated memory regions flanking the
image. The number of required descriptors to describe this layout
will be 2 * 2 + 3 == 7. This patch updates the calculations to account
for the worst-case scenario.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
