Currently, "push byte %[Vector]" causes nasm warning when Vector is larger
than 0x7F. This is because push accepts a signed value, and byte means
signed int8. Maximum signed int8 is 0x7F.
When Vector is larger the 0x7F, for example, when Vector is 255, byte 255
turns to -1, and causes the warning "signed byte value exceeds".
To avoid such warning, use dword instead of byte, this will increase 3 bytes
for each IdtVector.
For IA32, the size of IdtVector will increase from 10 bytes to 13 bytes.
For X64, the size of IdtVector will increase from 15 bytes to 18 bytes.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
A memory range can be submitted for attribute changes which is large
enough to not require a page split during the attribute update. Consider
the following scenario:
1. An attribute update removed the RW attribute on a range large enough
to not require a page split.
2. Later, an attributes update is called to re-add the RW attribute for
a subsection of that larger page which requires a split
3. The attribute update logic performs a page split, so now the parent
and child pages have matching attributes
4. Then, the attribute update logic changes the child page to have the
RW attribute.
5. The child page would then correctly have the RW attribute added but
the parent page would still have the RW attribute removed which will
cause an improper access violation.
The page being split should have loose attributes to accommodate the
above case. The split page should always have the attributes set so
the lowest level page frame determines the access rights as detailed
in 4.10.2.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer Manual. Setting the User/Supervisor attribute shouldn't
be necessary.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <t@taylorbeebe.com>
The AP vector consists of 2 parts:
1. the initial 16-bit code that should be under 1MB and page aligned.
2. the 32-bit/64-bit code that can be anywhere in the memory with any
alignment.
The need of part #2 is because the memory under 1MB is temporary
"stolen" for use and will "give" back after all AP wake up. The range
of memory is not marked as code page in page table. CPU may trigger
exception as soon as NX is enabled.
The part #2 memory allocation can be done in the MpInitLibInitialize.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Today's implementation allocates below 1MB memory for the 16bit, 32bit
and 64bit code.
But it's not necessary since now the 32bit and 64bit code run at high
memory no matter in PEI and DXE phase.
The patch simplifies the logic to remove the code that handles the
case when WakeupBufferHigh is 0.
It also reduce the memory foot print under 1MB by allocating
memory for 16bit code only.
MP_CPU_EXCHANGE_INFO is still under 1MB which is immediate
after the 16bit code.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
global in NASM file is used for symbols that are
referenced in C files.
Remove unneeded global keyword in NASM file.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Today's implementation assumes PEI phase runs at 32bit so
the execution-disable feature is not applicable.
It's not always TRUE.
The patch allocates 32bit&64bit code buffer for PEI phase as well.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Today InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx is called from three modules:
1. DxeCore (links to DxeCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
DxeCore expects it initializes the IDT entries as well as
assigning separate stacks for #DF and #PF.
2. CpuMpPei (links to PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
and CpuDxe (links to DxeCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
It's called for each thread for only assigning separate stacks for
#DF and #PF. The IDT entries initialization is skipped because
caller sets InitData->X64.InitDefaultHandlers to FALSE.
Additionally, SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib, SmmCpuExceptionHandlerLib
also implement such API and the behavior of the API is simply to initialize
IDT entries only.
Because it mixes the IDT entries initialization and separate stacks
assignment for certain exception handlers together, in order to know
whether the function call only initializes IDT entries, or assigns stacks,
we need to check:
1. value of InitData->X64.InitDefaultHandlers
2. library instance
This patch cleans up the code to separate the stack assignment to a new API:
InitializeSeparateExceptionStacks().
Only when caller calls the new API, the separate stacks are assigned.
With this change, the SecPei and Smm instance can return unsupported which
gives caller a very clear status.
The old API InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx() is removed in this patch.
Because no platform module is consuming the old API, the impact is none.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers() expects caller allocates IDT while
InitializeCpuInterruptHandlers() allocates 256 IDT entries itself.
InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers() fills max 32 IDT entries allocated
by caller. If caller allocates 10 entries, the API just fills 10 IDT
entries.
The inconsistency between the two APIs makes code hard to
unerstand and hard to share.
Because there is only one caller (CpuDxe) for
InitializeCpuInterruptHandler(), this patch updates CpuDxe driver
to allocates 256 IDT entries then call
InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers().
This is also a backward compatible change.
With this change, InitializeCpuInterruptHandlers() is removed
completely.
And InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers() fills max 32 entries for PEI
and SMM instance, max 256 entries for DXE instance.
Such behavior matches to the original one.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Additionally removed two useless global variables:
"SPIN_LOCK mDisplayMessageSpinLock" from SMM instance.
"UINTN mEnabledInterruptNum" from DXE instance.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Today the DXE instance allocates code page and then copies the IDT
vectors to the allocated code page. Then it fixes up the vector number
in the IDT vector.
But if we update the NASM file to generate 256 IDT vectors, there is
no need to do the copy and fix-up.
A side effect is 4096 bytes (HOOKAFTER_STUB_SIZE * 256) is used for
256 IDT vectors while 32 IDT vectors only require 512 bytes without
this change, in following library instances:
1. 32bit SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib and PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib
2. 64bit PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib
But considering the code logic simplification, 3.5K extra space is
not a big deal.
If 3.5K is too much, we can enhance the code further to generate 32
vectors for above mentioned library instances.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF? https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3912
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for other APs to complete SMM rendezvous in
relaxed AP mode.
VariableSmm and VariableStandaloneMM driver in MdeModulePkg need
to use this services but MdeModulePkg can't depend on UefiCpuPkg.
Thus, the solution is moving SmmCpuRendezvouslib.h from UefiCpuPkg
to MdePkg and creating SmmCpuRendezvousLib NullLib version
implementation in MdePkg as dependency for the pkg that can't
depend on UefiCpuPkg.
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Li <zhihao.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
There are two libraries: MdePkg/CpuLib and UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuLib and
UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuLib will be merged to MdePkg/CpuLib. To avoid build
failure, add CpuLib dependency to all modules that depend on UefiCpuLib.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Pu <yu.pu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
During AP bringup, just after switching to long mode, APs will do some
cpuid calls to verify that the extended topology leaf (0xB) is available
so they can fetch their x2 APIC IDs from it. In the case of SEV-ES,
these cpuid instructions must be handled by direct use of the GHCB MSR
protocol to fetch the values from the hypervisor, since a #VC handler
is not yet available due to the AP's stack not being set up yet.
For SEV-SNP, rather than relying on the GHCB MSR protocol, it is
expected that these values would be obtained from the SEV-SNP CPUID
table instead. The actual x2 APIC ID (and 8-bit APIC IDs) would still
be fetched from hypervisor using the GHCB MSR protocol however, so
introducing support for the SEV-SNP CPUID table in that part of the AP
bring-up code would only be to handle the checks/validation of the
extended topology leaf.
Rather than introducing all the added complexity needed to handle these
checks via the CPUID table, instead let the BSP do the check in advance,
since it can make use of the #VC handler to avoid the need to scan the
SNP CPUID table directly, and add a flag in ExchangeInfo to communicate
the result of this check to APs.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634
The memory allocated through "PeiAllocatePool" is located in HOB, and
in DXE phase, the HOB will be migrated to a different location.
After the migration, the data stored in the HOB stays the same, but the
address of pointer to the memory(such as the pointers in ACPI_CPU_DATA
structure) changes, which may cause "PiSmmCpuDxeSmm" driver can't find
the memory(the pointers in ACPI_CPU_DATA structure) that allocated in
"PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib", so use "PeiAllocatePages" to allocate
memory instead.
Signed-off-by: Jason Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
Currently SecCore.inf having the resetvector code under IA32. if the
user wants to use both SecCore and UefiCpuPkg ResetVector it's not
possible, since SecCore and ResetVector(VTF0.INF/ResetVector.inf)
are sharing the same GUID which is BFV. to overcome this issue we can
create the Duplicate version of the SecCore.inf as SecCoreNative.inf
which contains pure SecCore Native functionality without resetvector.
SecCoreNative.inf should have the Unique GUID so that it can be used
along with UefiCpuPkg ResetVector in there implementation.
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Cc: Digant H Solanki <digant.h.solanki@intel.com>
Cc: Sangeetha V <sangeetha.v@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashraf Ali S <ashraf.ali.s@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when user wants to use
more than 4G using 2M Page it will leads to use more number of Page
table entries. using the 1-GByte Page table user can use more than
4G Memory by reducing the page table entries using 1-GByte Page,
this patch attached can access memory range till 512GByte via Linear-
Address Translation to a 1-GByte Page.
Build Tool: if the nasm is not found it will throw Build errors like
FileNotFoundError: [WinError 2]The system cannot find the file specified
run the command wil try except block to get meaningful error message
Test Result: Tested in both Simulation environment and Hardware
both works fine without any issues.
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Cc: Sangeetha V <sangeetha.v@intel.com>
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
Cc: Sahil Dureja <sahil.dureja@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashraf Ali S <ashraf.ali.s@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3621
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3631
Current CPU feature initialization design:
During normal boot, CpuFeaturesPei module (inside FSP) initializes the
CPU features. During S3 boot, CpuFeaturesPei module does nothing, and
CpuSmm driver (in SMRAM) initializes CPU features instead.
This code change prevents CpuSmm driver from re-initializing CPU
features during S3 resume if CpuFeaturesPei module has done the same
initialization.
In addition, EDK2 contains DxeIpl PEIM that calls S3RestoreConfig2 PPI
during S3 boot and this PPI eventually calls CpuSmm driver (in SMRAM) to
initialize the CPU features, so "EDK2 + FSP" does not have the CPU
feature initialization issue during S3 boot. But "coreboot" does not
contain DxeIpl PEIM and the issue appears, unless
"PcdCpuFeaturesInitOnS3Resume" is set to TRUE.
Signed-off-by: Jason Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
