This patch makes Pkcs7VerifyDxe check that it has not already been
installed before installing its protocols. This prevents the case
where loading it as an external driver (either manually, through
Driver#### variables, etc.) will refuse to add a second provider of
the API.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
VerifySignature can be implemented using a mirror of the
AuthenticodeVerify function that's already in use in the
ImageVerificationDXE environment, so this patch simply wires up
VerifySignature using that code.
<NOTE: Only Authenticode-signature verification was supported by
this VerifySignature() implementation now.)
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Reviewed-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
Remove redundant include to UefiAcpiDataTable.h as
SmmCommunication.h will help to include it.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Current code for case "TPM not working properly" uses the predefined
macro __FILE__ in debug format string, but uses predefined macro
__LINE__ as parameter, and it also uses multiple pairs of "" in debug
format string.
To be simple and clear, this patch is to update the code to just use
"DriverEntry: TPM not working properly\n" as the debug message.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Amy Chan <amy.chan@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Add the size check for invalid format detection in AllowedDb,
RevokedDb and TimeStampDb list contents.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Qin Long <qin.long@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
This patch updates the PcdPkcs7CertBuffer PCD to use the new
generated test certificate data for PKCS7 verification. This
was used as sample trusted certificate in the verification of
Signed Capsule Update.
(The updated value is still only for test purpose.)
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Update SecureBootConfigDxe to support AUTH_2 format data enrollment
to DBX.
Free opened file handle resource after exit PK/KEK/DB/DBX/DBT
enrollment page.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Measure DBT into PCR[7] in initial measurement phase if present and
not empty by following TCG PC Client PFP 00.49.
The previous patch according to 00.21 is removed
1404e3a150
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
v2: update hash value in SecureBootConfig.vfr to keep
them consistent with macro definition in SecureBootConfigImpl.h
since we removed the sha-1 definition in Hash table
and related macro, but the macro definition HashAlg index
may be value 4 which is exceed the range of the Hash
table array.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Zhang Lubo <lubo.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244
Currently, when software HashLib (HashLibBaseCryptoRouter) and related
HashInstanceLib instances are used, PcdTcg2HashAlgorithmBitmap is
expected to be configured to 0 in platform dsc.
But PcdTcg2HashAlgorithmBitmap has default value 0xFFFFFFFF in
SecurityPkg.dec, and some platforms forget to configure it to 0 or
still configure it to 0xFFFFFFFF in platform dsc, that will make final
PcdTcg2HashAlgorithmBitmap value incorrect.
This patch is to add CONSTRUCTOR in HashLib (HashLibBaseCryptoRouter)
and PcdTcg2HashAlgorithmBitmap will be set to 0 in the CONSTRUCTOR.
Current HASH_LIB_PEI_ROUTER_GUID HOB created in
HashLibBaseCryptoRouterPei is shared between modules that link
HashLibBaseCryptoRouterPei.
To avoid mutual interference, separated HASH_LIB_PEI_ROUTER_GUID HOBs
with gEfiCallerIdGuid Identifier will be created for those modules.
This patch is also to add check in HashLib (HashLibBaseCryptoRouter)
for the mismatch of supported HashMask between modules that may link
different HashInstanceLib instances, warning will be reported if
mismatch is found.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338
Update the Tpm12CommandLib to consistently check the returnCode
field of a response packet. These checks are missing from the
GetCapability and SelfTest commands. The functions
Tpm12ContinueSelfTest(), Tpm12GetCapabilityFlagPermanent(), and
Tpm12GetCapabilityFlagVolatile() are updated to verify that the
response returnCode is not an error.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288
gEfiSecurityPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdTcgPhysicalPresenceInterfaceVer was
introduced to configure physical presence interface version. but test
or user needs to build different images to support different versions
separately as the PCD does not support Dynamic types.
This patch is to extend the PCD to support Dynamic types and add a
setup option in Tcg2ConfigDxe driver to configure the physical
presence interface version, the PCD needs to be DynamicHii type and
maps to the setup option.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
