Add code to compare ParentPagingEntry Attribute&Mask and input
Attribute&Mask to decide if new next level page table is needed
in non-present ParentPagingEntry condition. This can help avoid
unneccessary page table creation.
For example, there is a page table in which [0, 1G] is mapped(Lv4[0]
,Lv3[0,0], a non-leaf level4 entry and a leaf level3 entry).And we
only want to map [1G, 1G+2M] linear address still as non-present.
The expected behaviour should be nothing happens in the process.
However, previous code logic doesn't check if ParentPagingEntry
Attribute&Mask and input Attribute&Mask are the same in non-present
ParentPagingEntry condition. Then a new 4K memory is allocated for
Lv2 since 1G+2M is not 1G-aligned.
So when ParentPagingEntry is non-present, before allocate 4K memory
for next level paging, we also check if ParentPagingEntry Attribute&
Mask and input Attribute&Mask are the same.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
f7686f2727