Compare commits
1 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
|
6051318ac7 |
@@ -144,9 +144,7 @@ _numadisable="false"
|
||||
_misc_adds="true"
|
||||
|
||||
# Set to "0" for periodic ticks, "1" to use CattaRappa mode (enabling full tickless) and "2" for tickless idle only.
|
||||
# Full tickless can give higher performances in case you use isolation of CPUs for tasks
|
||||
# and it works only when using the nohz_full kernel parameter, otherwise behaves like idle.
|
||||
# Just tickless idle perform better for most platforms.
|
||||
# Full tickless can give higher performances in various cases but, depending on hardware, lower consistency. Just tickless idle can perform better on some platforms (mostly AMD based).
|
||||
_tickless="2"
|
||||
|
||||
# Set to "true" to use ACS override patch - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PCI_passthrough_via_OVMF#Bypassing_the_IOMMU_groups_.28ACS_override_patch.29 - Kernel default is "false"
|
||||
|
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ _set_cpu_scheduler() {
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "514" ]; then
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("pds" "bmq" "cacule" "cfs")
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "515" ]; then
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("pds" "bmq" "cacule" "tt" "bore" "cfs")
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("pds" "bmq" "cacule" "tt" "cfs")
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "516" ]; then
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("pds" "bmq" "cacule" "cfs")
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "517" ]; then
|
||||
@@ -298,8 +298,6 @@ _set_cpu_scheduler() {
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("cfs" "pds" "bmq" "cacule" "tt" "bore")
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "600" ]; then
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("cfs" "tt" "bore")
|
||||
elif [ "$_kver" = "601" ]; then
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("cfs" "bore")
|
||||
else
|
||||
_avail_cpu_scheds=("cfs")
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@@ -1330,7 +1328,7 @@ _tkg_srcprep() {
|
||||
plain "Use CattaRappa mode (Tickless/Dynticks) ?"
|
||||
_tickless_array_text=(
|
||||
"No, use periodic ticks."
|
||||
"Yes, full tickless baby!\n Full tickless can give higher performances in case you use isolation of CPUs for task, in other cases it behaves as Idle."
|
||||
"Yes, full tickless baby!\n Can give higher performances in many cases but lower consistency on some hardware."
|
||||
"Just tickless idle plz.\n Just tickless idle can perform better with some platforms (mostly AMD) or CPU schedulers (mostly MuQSS)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
_default_index="2"
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user