Create two new functions to fetch mrc_cache data (replacing
mrc_cache_get_current):
- mrc_cache_load_current: fetches the mrc_cache data and drops it into
the given buffer. This is useful for ARM platforms where the mmap
operation is very expensive.
- mrc_cache_mmap_leak: fetch the mrc_cache data and puts it into a
given buffer. This is useful for platforms where the mmap operation
is a no-op (like x86 platforms). As the name mentions, we are not
freeing the memory that we allocated with the mmap, so it is the
caller's responsibility to do so.
Additionally, we are replacing mrc_cache_latest with
mrc_cache_get_latest_slot_info, which does not check the validity of
the data when retrieving the current mrc_cache slot. This allows the
caller some flexibility in deciding where they want the mrc_cache data
stored (either in an mmaped region or at a given address).
BUG=b:150502246
BRANCH=None
TEST=Testing on a nami (x86) device:
reboot from ec console. Make sure memory training happens.
reboot from ec console. Make sure that we don't do training again.
Signed-off-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@google.com>
Change-Id: I259dd4f550719d821bbafa2d445cbae6ea22e988
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44006
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The wake source macro for GPE events was using 'GPIO'. However,
current usage is really all GPEs. Therefore, provide clarity
in the naming in order to allow for proper GPIO wake events
that are separate from the ACPI GPE block.
BUG=b:159947207
Change-Id: I27d0ab439c58b1658ed39158eddb1213c24d328f
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44527
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Giant commit aee7ab2 (soc/intel/braswell: Clean up) reformatted comments
to follow the coding style, among many other things. This commit updates
some comments on Bay Trail with two objectives: follow the coding style,
and reduce the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ibe942a20c624e2c74801c8816616ec83851949af
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43935
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
SeaBIOS on Bay Trail would time out when trying to access a SATA drive.
Turns out that there's two mistakes in the SATA initialization sequence:
- PCI register 0x94 is wrongly cleared with a bitwise-and operation.
- PCI register 0x9c is instead written to 0x98, clobbering the latter.
After correcting them, SeaBIOS can boot from SATA on Asrock Q1900M.
Change-Id: I5cc4b9b1695653066f47de67afc79f08f0341cc5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44088
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Máté Kukri <kukri.mate@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and avoids
unlikely but potential bugs regarding missing braces in macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ic341fe70e7d6fb4751f2fefbdedbee5c90dd8d1f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43201
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and
prevents possible bugs when using these macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I18e9a750901f1bf8d3b61f4b64bbed907bc1fa15
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43192
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3:
Accesses to the PM1 status registers are done through byte or word
accesses.
The same is said about the PM1 Enable registers. Therefore, reporting
dword-sized access is wrong and means nothing anyway. Since some other
platforms use word-sized access, use word everywhere for consistency.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: I6f85c9a4126f37ab2a193c3ab50a6c8e62cf6515
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43432
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
All supported x86 chips select HAVE_CF9_RESET, and also use 0xcf9 as
reset register in FADT. How unsurprising. We might as well use that
information to automatically fill in the FADT accordingly. So, do it.
To avoid having x86-specific code under arch-agnostic `acpi/`, create a
new optional `arch_fill_fadt` function, and override it for x86 systems.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ib436b04aafd66c3ddfa205b870c1e95afb3e846d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43389
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
They are ignored if the ACPI_FADT_WBINVD flag is set, which is required
on current ACPI versions and only maintained for ACPI 1.0 compatibility.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ief1219542ba71d18153b64180e0ff60bd1e7687b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43390
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Instead, just flip the desired bits using bitwise operations. As this is
initially zero, the resulting value is the same. This allows flags to be
set from anywhere regardless of execution order.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Icfd580a20524936cd0adac574331b09fb2aea925
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43387
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
None of the currently-supported chips has PM1b_EVT nor PM1b_CNT event
register blocks. According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3,
sections 4.8.1.1 and 4.8.1.2 (PM1 Event/Control Registers):
If the PM1b_EVT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
If the PM1b_CNT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with PM1b for now. So, drop unneeded writes to PM1b fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iff788b2ff17ba190a8dd9b0b540f1ef059a1a0ea
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43380
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
None of the currently-supported chips has a GPE1 block. The ACPI spec,
version 6.3, section 4.8.1.6 (General-Purpose Event Registers) says:
If a generic register block is not supported then its respective
block pointer and block length values in the FADT table contain zeros.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with GPE1 for now. So, drop the unneeded writes to GPE1 fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iefc4bbc6e16fac12e0a9324d5a50b20aad59a6cd
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43379
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
