The DSI initialization is almost the same for 8173 and 8183, so we want
to move most of common functions into common/dsi.c.
The major board-specific functions left are:
- reset (controller register has different format)
- pin_drv_ctrl (8183 does not need this)
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=make -j # board=oak (mt8173)
Change-Id: I8d4369a3c84db551287a9c9d1b22f552c5f7518d
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34769
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
It is easier to track CAR_GLOBAL_MIGRATION which is
the approach to be deprecated with the next release.
This change enforces new policy; POSTCAR_STAGE=y is
not allowed together with CAR_GLOBAL_MIGRATION=y.
Change-Id: I0dbad6a14e68bf566ac0f151dc8ea259e5ae2250
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34804
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Build error on missing vb2ex_printf() in bootblock stage
Add the file vboot_logic.c which contains the missing vb2ex_printf().
BUG=N/A
TEST=Boot Linux 4.20 and verify logging on Facebook FBG-1701
Change-Id: I3f649f3faf1e812d592e4981bc75698e2cad1cc8
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34666
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao <lance.zhao@gmail.com>
The Kohaku V24 schematic adds two additional temperature sensors
to the EC. Add these to the DPTF tables.
Cq-Depend: chromium:1742914
BRANCH=none
BUG=b:138578073
TEST=Rebuild EC and BIOS, look for new thermal sensors in kernel.
1. Build EC
``cd ~/trunk/src/platform/ec``
``make -j BOARD=kohaku``
2. Program EC
``./util/flash_ec --board=kohaku``
3. Reboot device
4. Rebuild BIOS
``cd ~/trunk/src/third_party/coreboot``
``FEATURES="noclean" FW_NAME=kohaku emerge-hatch chromeos-ec depthcharge
vboot_reference libpayload coreboot-private-files intel-cmlfsp
coreboot-private-files-hatch coreboot chromeos-bootimage``
5. Use flashrom to program the BIOS
6. Reboot device
7. Log into the root console (ctrl-alt-F2 or servo)
8. Example thermal sensor information
``grep . /sys/class/thermal/t*/type``
Look for "TSR0" through "TSR3" in the output.
Change-Id: Ib8f38beae6392855927ce1249c229d7a114c72b2
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34765
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Oops, I missed this in the last CL.
The pin needs to be configured as owned by GPIO, so that the kernel
driver can bind it with an IRQ.
BUG=b:139165490
TEST=Ensure kernel nastygram about inability to claim the IRQ is gone
Change-Id: I26c08d75d8b4e3b834db6e90868239899605fa5b
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34815
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
In general, third party code (such as vboot) doesn't know what the
underlying types are for the integers in <stdint.h>, so these macros are
useful for portably printing them. Of these definitions, coreboot so far
has only used PRIu64 (in one place), which isn't needed anymore since we
know what the underlying type of a u64 is.
Change-Id: I9e3a300f9b1c38e4831b030ff8af3fed2fa60f14
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Change the stoneyridge definitions into picasso. The named 0 and 1
buses are controlled by the PSP and not directly accessible by host
firmware. I2C4 operates only in slave mode so is not added to to
the bus clear-after-reset sequence.
The I2C controller is fundamentally the same as on Stoney Ridge so
the ability to clear a potentially jammed bus is still required.
Program Picasso's new pad control registers in the MISC AcpiMmio
space according to the recommended settings.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ibbc5504ebc36654e28c79fe3ae17cc0d9255118f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33763
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
This is a consolidation of the respective feature in `soc/intel/*lake/`,
including additional support for MAINBOARD_POWER_STATE_PREVIOUS.
For the latter, firmware has to keep track of the `previous` state. The
feature was already advertised in Kconfig long ago, but not implemented.
SoC code has to call pmc_set_power_failure_state() at least once during
boot and needs to implement pmc_soc_set_afterg3_en() for the actual
register write.
Change-Id: Ic6970a79d9b95373c2855f4c92232d2aa05963bb
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34724
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
The MT8183 SOC has a DISP (display controller) that supports
overlay, read/write DMA, ... etc. The output of DISP goes to
display interface DSI, DPI or DBI directly.
Reference: MT8183 Application Processor Functional Spec,
6.1 Display Controller
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Kukui
Change-Id: Ic4aecc58d081f14f5d136b9ff8e813e6f40f78eb
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31478
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
The 'dual DSI mode' was never used by any real boards running coreboot
and is introducing lots of complexity when it comes to refactoring.
In order to create a common display stack for MTK SOCs, we want to first
drop dual DSI mode so 8173 and 8183 DSI/DDP implementation will be more
similar to each other.
BUG=b:80501386,b:117254947
TEST=emerge-oak coreboot
Change-Id: I357c30cc687803ca8045d0b055dec2e22eef4291
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34693
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
PMC logic shuts down the PCH thermal sensor when CPU is in a C-state and
DTS Temp <= Low Temp Threshold (LTT) in case of Dynamic Thermal Shutdown
when S0ix is enabled.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Verified Thermal Device (B0: D20: F2) TSPM offset 0x1c [LTT (8:0)]
value is 0xFE on Sarien.
Change-Id: Ibc336be0523ff4e65a818474907faf20fc417ff4
Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33131
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
PMC logic shuts down the PCH thermal sensor when CPU is in a C-state and
DTS Temp <= Low Temp Threshold (LTT) in case of Dynamic Thermal shutdown
when S0ix is enabled.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Verified Thermal Device(B0: D18: F0) TSPM offset 0x1c [LTT (8:0)]
value is 0xFE on Arcada.
Change-Id: I1915b974b10638b0f6ab97c6fb9b7a58d2cabc59
Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Recent Coverity scan indicated potential NULL deference; if either
spi->dma_in or spi->dma_out are NULL, the fifo_error() check could
dereference a NULL pointer.
Also fixed what appears to be a logic bug for the spi->dma_out case,
where it was using the todo (count) from spi->dma_in.
Found-by: Coverity CID 1241838, 1241854
Change-Id: Icd1412f0956c0a4a75266d1873d5e9848aceee32
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34787
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The common code adheres to the Intel requirement of bringing up the
cores with INIT SIPI SIPI. This sequence is tolerated on some AMD
AMD CPUs but fails on others. Add a way to skip the second SIPI.
TEST=Mock up on grunt and verify no errors
BUG=b:138919564
Change-Id: I201869003ddc7d04d332cd5734ac6d63979d89e0
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34759
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There was the potential for misuse of the override early GPIO table,
because if the override early GPIO table did not have a corresponding
entry in the base table, it would not get overridden, and there was
no way to know except manual inspection (this has already happened
here), so now all hatch mainboards are required to explicitly list out
all of their required early GPIOs.
TEST=booted several hatch boards, verified that they can communicate
with TPM and successfully train memory
Change-Id: I0552b08a284fd6fb41a09fef431a0d006b0cf0bd
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34782
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Currently SPI bus id is used to map to the controller in order to set
the controller state. In certain platforms SPI bus id might not be
exactly the same as GSPI bus id. For example, in Intel platforms SPI bus
id 0 maps to fast spi i.e. SPI going to the flash and SPI bus id 1 .. n
map to GSPI bus id 0 .. n-1. Hence using SPI bus id leads to mapping to the
GSPI controller that is not enabled. Use the GSPI id bus so that the right
controller is set to active state. This fixes the regression introduced
by CB:34449
BUG=b:135941367
TEST=Boot to ChromeOS.
Change-Id: I792ab1fa6529f5317218896ad05321f8f17cedcd
Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34761
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
