This patch updates the following GPIO settings.
1. Set Native termination for GPP_G0 - G4 SD card pins.
2. Set GPP_B19 to NF1.
BUG=b:123907904
TEST=Verified SD card functionality on hatch. Checked for SD detection,
transferred files to and from SD card.
Change-Id: I4549ac7377d7f58f51cda0eb96a62604fd31d2f2
Signed-off-by: Krishna Prasad Bhat <krishna.p.bhat.d@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32176
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
DCXO consists of core that generates clock and output buffers that
provide clock to other peripheral components.
This patch mainly eliminates the extra power consumption of output buffers.
We only enable the buffer for SOC and disable unused buffers for power-saving.
Also disable useless buffer power mode to guarantee the lowest power state.
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Kukui.
Change-Id: I2e5ce181ad327ccf852979da53baca4f249912fe
Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32323
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: You-Cheng Syu <youcheng@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
size_t is the wrong type to store the return value of
acpi_device_path_fill(), since any negative error values will be
converted to a very large unsigned integer and potentially cause
buffer overflow.
Change-Id: Ia8ed62ecfac8eaa18a61545bd203b3c7a7cd9ca5
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Found-by: Coverity CID 1402095
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33962
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
This config option, when set, will allow the platform to skip display
initialization in normal (non-developer, non-recovery) mode. This allows
platforms that do not implement firmware UI in normal mode to skip the
display init in firmware.
TEST=Set option CONFIG_VBOOT and clear CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT
and the display should initialize in ramstage when platform boots. Set
CONFIG_VBOOT and set CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT and the display
initialization should be skipped in coreboot.
Signed-off-by: Sukerkar, Amol N <amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icadad6da34dcb817af02868e89a94ea62dbfa7b3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33844
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
G505S doesn't have any SAS or NVMe controllers and couldn't have a TPM,
so it makes sense to disable the related SeaBIOS options for this board.
This reduces the size of compiled SeaBIOS by 129344-110048=19296 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Mike Banon <mikebdp2@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ib0183b7786ecd77bb0df923bc84908275f2fe14c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33870
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change intentionally removes the definition of PCH_DEV_PMC from
ramstage to avoid silent errors. This device gets hidden from PCI bus
in FSP-S and hence dropped from the root bus by the resource
allocator. In order to avoid incorrect references to the device, avoid
defining it in ramstage where it known to return NULL.
BUG=b:136861224
Change-Id: I4f69470ec80c7127a2b604ed2b1f794f5a63e126
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34120
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
PMC device gets hidden from PCI bus after FSP-S call. Thus, it gets
removed from the root bus as leftover unused device. With change
903b40a8a4 ("soc/intel: Replace uses of dev_find_slot()"), all uses
of dev_find_slot() were replaced by pcidev_path_on_root() which relies
on scanning of root bus to find the requested device. Since PMC device
is removed from the root bus, pcidev_path_on_root() returns NULL for
it thus resulting in configuration being skipped for the PMC
ultimately resulting in S3 failures.
Since the PCH_DEV_PMC was just used to get to chip config, this
change replaces the use of PCH_DEV_PMC with SA_DEV_ROOT.
BUG=b:136861224
Change-Id: Id68db8382b7b98e8e2e4a65ded1a6fb3bd057051
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
PMC device gets hidden from PCI bus after FSP-S call. Thus, it gets
removed from the root bus as leftover unused device. With change
903b40a8a4 ("soc/intel: Replace uses of dev_find_slot()"), all uses
of dev_find_slot() were replaced by pcidev_path_on_root() which relies
on scanning of root bus to find the requested device. Since PMC device
is removed from the root bus, pcidev_path_on_root() returns NULL for
it thus resulting in configuration being skipped for the PMC
ultimately resulting in S3 failures.
Since the PCH_DEV_PMC was just used to get to chip config, this change
replaces the use of PCH_DEV_PMC with SA_DEV_ROOT.
BUG=b:136861224
TEST=Verified that S3 works fine on hatch.
Change-Id: Ie5ade00ac2aca697608f1bdea9764b71c26e2112
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34116
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
We have 3 similar Lenovo mainboards - x60 (oldest), t60, and z61t (most
recent addition). The only one with two consequent 2s as the C-types
is t60:
static acpi_cstate_t cst_entries[] = {
{ 1, 1, 1000, { 0x7f, 1, 2, { 0 }, 1, 0 } },
{ 2, 1, 500, { 0x01, 8, 0, { 0 }, DEFAULT_PMBASE + LV2, 0 } },
{ 2, 17, 250, { 0x01, 8, 0, { 0 }, DEFAULT_PMBASE + LV3, 0 } },
};
It seems that 3 could be a better choice for the last line here.
UNTESTED on a real hardware.
Change-Id: I090e82d5f4ae25c768ff45a01a8dd76ff8a96a90
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/29160
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Family 17h will not use the Arch2008 (a.k.a. v5) wrapper. Remove
all source, support functions, and comments related to AGESA.
Family 17h requires v9 which has no similarities to v5 for
integration into a host firmware. AGESA v9 support will be added
via subsequent patches into the appropriate locations.
Change-Id: Iea1a41941a0ba364a6abaaf31cc8e1145db4a236
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33755
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
When system shuts down, RTC enable eosc calibration feature to save
power. Then coreboot RTC driver needs to call rtc_enable_dcxo function
at every boot to switch RTC clock source to dcxo.
BUG=b:128467245
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Kukui
Change-Id: Iee21e7611df8959cbbc63b6e6655cfb462147748
Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32339
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Some of the values used for GPIO_CFG and MISCCFG were not correct,
causing GPEs to not work correctly. This adjusts them according to the
values found in the original ACPI tables for the System76 Gazelle.
Unfortunately, the Intel documentation[1] mentioned below is
also incorrect. I have mentioned this to Intel already. The source
for the Intel CoffeeLake FSP also confirms these new numbers.
This was tested on a System76 Gazelle (gaze14). The EC uses GPP_K3 for
its GPE and GPP_K6 is used for the lid switch GPE. Both function
correctly after applying this change.
[1] Intel Document #572235:
Intel ® 300 Series Chipset Families
Platform Controller Hub
External Design Specification (EDS) - Volume 2 of 2
Change-Id: I4ecc9552468037598ef5d4e10122d660dcbfe71d
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33941
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
While running the s0ix cycling test, we observed SMM Handler caused
a stack overflow. This error happens during event log access.
This change is to increase the SMM_MODULE_STACK size to 0x800
BUG=b:135551854
TEST=suspend_resume test pass 500+ cycles, originally issue happenes
within 150 cycle
Change-Id: Ib4686b4d2d4fc3976068779314f4ee15ef4a8ae2
Signed-off-by: Kane Chen <kane.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33999
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
To call dev_find_slot(0, xx) in romstage can produce
invalid results since PCI bus enumeration has not
been progressed yet.
Replace this with method that relies on bus topology
that walks the root bus only.
Change-Id: I2883610059bb9fa860bba01179e7d5c58cae00e5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33996
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Like the line above it, this should be & instead of | (otherwise it will
always incorrectly return true). spi_locked() is only used internally to
decide which opcodes will be used to talk to the flash, and if it is
falsely reported as locked, the worst case should be a denial of service
(unless there are more bugs).
Change-Id: I5208b523c815d15d7263594f06ccfacd8a9510b1
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Found-by: Coverity CID 1402092
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33963
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
