Nicholas Chin 35599f9a66 Docs: Replace Recommonmark with MyST Parser
Recommonmark has been deprecated since 2021 [1] and the last release was
over 3 years ago [2]. As per their announcement, Markedly Structured
Text (MyST) Parser [3] is the recommended replacement.

For the most part, the existing documentation is compatible with MyST,
as both parsers are built around the CommonMark flavor of Markdown. The
main difference that affects coreboot is how the Sphinx toctree is
generated. Recommonmark has a feature called auto_toc_tree, which
converts single level lists of references into a toctree:

* [Part 1: Starting from scratch](part1.md)
* [Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org](part2.md)
* [Part 3: Writing unit tests](part3.md)
* [Managing local additions](managing_local_additions.md)
* [Flashing firmware](flashing_firmware/index.md)

MyST Parser does not provide a replacement for this feature, meaning the
toctree must be defined manually. This is done using MyST's syntax for
Sphinx directives:

```{toctree}
:maxdepth: 1

Part 1: Starting from scratch <part1.md>
Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org <part2.md>
Part 3: Writing unit tests <part3.md>
Managing local additions <managing_local_additions.md>
Flashing firmware <flashing_firmware/index.md>
```

Internally, auto_toc_tree essentially converts lists of references into
the Sphinx toctree structure that the MyST syntax above more directly
represents.

The toctrees were converted to the MyST syntax using the following
command and Python script:

`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 python conv_toctree.py`

```
import re
import sys

in_list = False
f = open(sys.argv[1])
lines = f.readlines()
f.close()

with open(sys.argv[1], "w") as f:
    for line in lines:
        match = re.match(r"^[-*+] \[(.*)\]\((.*)\)$", line)
        if match is not None:
            if not in_list:
                in_list = True
                f.write("```{toctree}\n")
                f.write(":maxdepth: 1\n\n")
            f.write(match.group(1) + " <" + match.group(2) + ">\n")
        else:
            if in_list:
                f.write("```\n")
            f.write(line)
            in_list = False

    if in_list:
        f.write("```\n")
```

While this does add a little more work for creating the toctree, this
does give more control over exactly what goes into the toctree. For
instance, lists of links to external resources currently end up in the
toctree, but we may want to limit it to pages within coreboot.

This change does break rendering and navigation of the documentation in
applications that can render Markdown, such as Okular, Gitiles, or the
GitHub mirror. Assuming the docs are mainly intended to be viewed after
being rendered to doc.coreboot.org, this is probably not an issue in
practice.

Another difference is that MyST natively supports Markdown tables,
whereas with Recommonmark, tables had to be written in embedded rST [4].
However, MyST also supports embedded rST, so the existing tables can be
easily converted as the syntax is nearly identical.

These were converted using
`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 sed -i "s/eval_rst/{eval-rst}/"`

Makefile.sphinx and conf.py were regenerated from scratch by running
`sphinx-quickstart` using the updated version of Sphinx, which removes a
lot of old commented out boilerplate. Any relevant changes coreboot had
made on top of the previous autogenerated versions of these files were
ported over to the newly generated file.

From some initial testing the generated webpages appear and function
identically to the existing documentation built with Recommonmark.

TEST: `make -C util/docker docker-build-docs` builds the documentation
successfully and the generated output renders properly when viewed in
a web browser.

[1] https://github.com/readthedocs/recommonmark/issues/221
[2] https://pypi.org/project/recommonmark/
[3] https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://doc.coreboot.org/getting_started/writing_documentation.html

Change-Id: I0837c1722fa56d25c9441ea218e943d8f3d9b804
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73158
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2024-03-21 16:11:56 +00:00

4.4 KiB

HP EliteBook 820 G2

This page is about the notebook HP EliteBook 820 G2.

Release status

HP EliteBook 820 G2 was released in 2015 and is now end of life. It can be bought from a secondhand market like Taobao or eBay.

Required proprietary blobs

The following blobs are required to operate the hardware:

  1. EC firmware
  2. Intel ME firmware
  3. Broadwell mrc.bin and refcode.elf

HP EliteBook 820 G2 uses SMSC MEC1324 as its embedded controller. The EC firmware is stored in the flash chip, but we don't need to touch it or use it in the coreboot build process.

Intel ME firmware is in the flash chip. It is not needed when building coreboot.

The Broadwell memory reference code binary and reference code blob is needed when building coreboot. Read the document Blobs used in Intel Broadwell boards on how to get these blobs.

Programming

Before flashing, remove the battery and the hard drive cover according to the Maintenance and Service Guide of this laptop.

HP EliteBook 820 G2 has two flash chips, a 16MiB system flash, and a 2MiB private flash. To install coreboot, we need to program both flash chips. Read HP Sure Start for detailed information.

HP EliteBook 820 G2 flash chip

To access the system flash, we need to connect the AC adapter to the machine, then clip on the flash chip with an SOIC-8 clip. An STM32-based flash programmer made with an STM32 development board is tested to work.

To access the private flash chip, we can use a ch341a based flash programmer and flash the chip with the AC adapter disconnected.

To flash coreboot on a board running OME firmware, create a backup for both flash chips, then do the following:

  1. Erase the private flash to disable the IFD protection
  2. Modify the IFD to shrink the BIOS region, so that we can put the firmware outside the protected flash region

To erase the private flash chip, attach it with the flash programmer via the SOIC-8 clip, then run:

flashrom -p <programmer> --erase

To modify the IFD, write the following flash layout to a file:

00000000:00000fff fd
00001000:00002fff gbe
00003000:005fffff me
00600000:00bfffff bios
00eb5000:00ffffff pd

Suppose the above layout file is layout.txt and the origin content of the system flash is in factory-sys.rom, run:

ifdtool -n layout.txt factory-sys.rom

Then a flash image with a new IFD will be in factory-sys.rom.new.

Flash the IFD of the system flash:

flashrom -p <programmer> --ifd -i fd -w factory-sys.rom.new

Then flash the coreboot image:

# first extend the 12M coreboot.rom to 16M
fallocate -l 16M build/coreboot.rom
flashrom -p <programmer> --ifd -i bios -w build/coreboot.rom

After coreboot is installed, the coreboot firmware can be updated with internal flashing:

flashrom -p internal --ifd -i bios --noverify-all -w build/coreboot.rom

Debugging

The board can be debugged with EHCI debug. The EHCI debug port is the USB port on the left.

Test status

Untested

  • NFC module
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Smart Card reader

Working

  • mainboards with i3-5010U, i5-5300U CPU, 16G+8G DDR3L memory
  • SATA and M.2 SATA disk
  • PCIe SSD
  • Webcam
  • Touch screen
  • Audio output from speaker and headphone jack
  • Intel GbE (needs a modified refcode documented in Blobs used in Intel Broadwell boards)
  • WLAN
  • WWAN
  • SD card reader
  • Internal LCD, DisplayPort and VGA video outputs
  • Dock
  • USB
  • Keyboard and touchpad
  • EC ACPI
  • S3 resume
  • TPM
  • Arch Linux with Linux 5.11.16
  • Broadwell MRC version 2.6.0 Build 0 and refcode from Purism Librem 13 v1
  • Graphics initialization with libgfxinit
  • Payload: SeaBIOS 1.16.2
  • EC firmware: KBC Revision 96.54 from OEM firmware version 01.05
  • Internal flashing under coreboot

Technology

+------------------+-----------------------------+
| SoC              | Intel Broadwell             |
+------------------+-----------------------------+
| EC               | SMSC MEC1324                |
+------------------+-----------------------------+
| Coprocessor      | Intel Management Engine     |
+------------------+-----------------------------+