Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Change-Id: I4f0a07b4ab729aafdb4a1149a7617cd34392cf12 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64967 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			401 lines
		
	
	
		
			14 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			401 lines
		
	
	
		
			14 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Writing unit tests for coreboot
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Introduction
 | |
| General thoughts about unit testing coreboot can be found in [Unit
 | |
| testing coreboot](../technotes/2020-03-unit-testing-coreboot.md).
 | |
| Additionally, [code coverage](../technotes/2021-05-code-coverage.md)
 | |
| support is available for unit tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document aims to guide developers through the process of adding and
 | |
| writing unit tests for coreboot modules.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As an example of unit under test, `src/device/i2c.c` (referred hereafter
 | |
| as UUT "Unit Under Test") will be used. This is simple module, thus it
 | |
| should be easy for the reader to focus solely on the testing logic,
 | |
| without the need to spend too much time on digging deeply into the
 | |
| source code details and flow of operations. That being said, a good
 | |
| understanding of what the unit under test is doing is crucial for
 | |
| writing unit tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This tutorial should also be helpful for developers who want to follow
 | |
| [TDD](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development). Even
 | |
| though TDD has a different work flow of building tests first, followed
 | |
| by the code that satisfies them, the process of writing tests and adding
 | |
| them to the tree is the same.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Analysis of unit under test First of all, it is necessary to
 | |
| precisely establish what we want to test in a particular module. Usually
 | |
| this will be an externally exposed API, which can be used by other
 | |
| modules.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    In case of our UUT, API consist of two methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      int i2c_read_field(unsigned int bus, uint8_t chip, uint8_t reg,
 | |
|                  uint8_t *data, uint8_t mask, uint8_t shift)
 | |
|      int i2c_write_field(unsigned int bus, uint8_t chip, uint8_t reg,
 | |
|                  uint8_t data, uint8_t mask, uint8_t shift)
 | |
| 
 | |
|    For sake of simplicity, let's focus on `i2c_read_field` in this
 | |
|    document.
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once the API is defined, the next question is __what__ this API is doing
 | |
| (or what it will be doing in case of TDD). In other words, what outputs
 | |
| we are expecting from particular functions, when providing particular
 | |
| input parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      int i2c_read_field(unsigned int bus, uint8_t chip, uint8_t reg,
 | |
|                  uint8_t *data, uint8_t mask, uint8_t shift)
 | |
| 
 | |
|    This is a method which means to read content of register `reg` from
 | |
|    i2c device on i2c `bus` and slave address `chip`, applying bit `mask`
 | |
|    and offset `shift` to it. Returned data should be placed in `data`.
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The next step is to determine all external dependencies of UUT in order
 | |
| to mock them out. Usually we want to isolate the UUT as much as
 | |
| possible, so that the test result depends __only__ on the behavior of
 | |
| UUT and not on the other modules. While some software dependencies may
 | |
| be hard to be mock (for example due to complicated dependencies) and
 | |
| thus should be simply linked into the test binaries, all hardware
 | |
| dependencies need to be mocked out, since in the user-space host
 | |
| environment, targets hardware is not available.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    `i2c_read_field` is calling `i2c_readb`, which eventually invokes
 | |
|    `i2c_transfer`. This method simply calls `platform_i2c_transfer`. The
 | |
|    last function in the chain is a hardware-touching one, and defined
 | |
|    separately for different SOCs. It is responsible for issuing
 | |
|    transactions on the i2c bus.  For the purpose of writing unit test,
 | |
|    we should mock this function.
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Adding new tests
 | |
| In order to keep the tree clean, the `tests/` directory should mimic the
 | |
| `src/` directory, so that test harness code is placed in a location
 | |
| corresponding to UUT. Furthermore, the naming convention is to add the
 | |
| suffix `-test` to the UUT name when creating a new test harness file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Considering that UUT is `src/device/i2c.c`, test file should be named
 | |
|    `tests/device/i2c-test.c`. When adding a new test file, it needs to
 | |
|    be registered with the coreboot unit testing infrastructure.
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Every directory under `tests/` should contain a Makefile.inc, similar to
 | |
| what can be seen under the `src/`. Register a new test in Makefile.inc,
 | |
| by __appending__ test name to the `tests-y` variable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      tests-y += i2c-test
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next step is to list all source files, which should be linked together
 | |
| in order to create test binary. Usually a tests requires only two files
 | |
| - UUT and test harness code, but sometimes more is needed to provide the
 | |
| test environment.  Source files are registered in `<test_name>-srcs`
 | |
| variable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      i2c-test-srcs += tests/device/i2c-test.c
 | |
|      i2c-test-srcs += src/device/i2c.c
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Above minimal configuration is a basis for further work. One can try to
 | |
| build and run test binary either by invoking `make
 | |
| tests/<test_dir>/<test_name>` or by running all unit tests (whole suite)
 | |
| for coreboot `make unit-tests`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      make tests/device/i2c-test
 | |
| 
 | |
|    or
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      make unit-tests
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| When trying to build test binary, one can often see linker complains
 | |
| about `undefined reference` to couple of symbols. This is one of
 | |
| solutions to determine all external dependencies of UUT - iteratively
 | |
| build test and resolve errors one by one. At this step, developer should
 | |
| decide either it's better to add an extra module to provide necessary
 | |
| definitions or rather mock such dependency. Quick guide through adding
 | |
| mocks is provided later in this doc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Writing new tests
 | |
| In coreboot, [Cmocka](https://cmocka.org/) is used as unit test
 | |
| framework. The project has exhaustive [API
 | |
| documentation](https://api.cmocka.org/). Let's see how we may
 | |
| incorporate it when writing tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Assertions
 | |
| Testing the UUT consists of calling the functions in the UUT and
 | |
| comparing the returned values to the expected values. Cmocka implements
 | |
| [a set of assert
 | |
| macros](https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka__asserts.html) to compare a
 | |
| value with an expected value. If the two values do not match, the test
 | |
| fails with an error message.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    In our example, the simplest test is to call UUT for reading our fake
 | |
|    devices registers and do all calculation in the test harness itself.
 | |
|    At the end, let's compare integers with `assert_int_equal`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      #define MASK        0x3
 | |
|      #define SHIFT        0x1
 | |
| 
 | |
|      static void i2c_read_field_test(void **state)
 | |
|      {
 | |
|              int bus, slave, reg;
 | |
|              int i, j;
 | |
|              uint8_t buf;
 | |
| 
 | |
|              mock_expect_params_platform_i2c_transfer();
 | |
| 
 | |
|              /* Read particular bits in all registers in all devices, then compare
 | |
|                 with expected value. */
 | |
|              for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_ex_devs); i++)
 | |
|                      for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_ex_devs[0].regs); j++) {
 | |
|                              i2c_read_field(i2c_ex_devs[i].bus,
 | |
|                                      i2c_ex_devs[i].slave,
 | |
|                                      i2c_ex_devs[i].regs[j].reg,
 | |
|                                      &buf, MASK, SHIFT);
 | |
|                              assert_int_equal((i2c_ex_devs[i].regs[j].data &
 | |
|                                      (MASK << SHIFT)) >> SHIFT, buf);
 | |
|                      };
 | |
|      }
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Mocks
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Overview
 | |
| Many coreboot modules are low level software that touch hardware
 | |
| directly.  Because of this, one of the most important and challenging
 | |
| part of writing tests is to design and implement mocks. A mock is a
 | |
| software component which implements the API of another component so that
 | |
| the test can verify that certain functions are called (or not called),
 | |
| verify the parameters passed to those functions, and specify the return
 | |
| values from those functions. Mocks are especially useful when the API to
 | |
| be implemented is one that accesses hardware components.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When writing a mock, the developer implements the same API as the module
 | |
| being mocked. Such a mock may, for example, register a set of driver
 | |
| methods. Behind this API, there is usually a simulation of real
 | |
| hardware.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    For purpose of our i2c test, we may introduce two i2c devices with
 | |
|    set of registers, which simply are structs in memory.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      /* Simulate two i2c devices, both on bus 0, each with three uint8_t regs
 | |
|         implemented. */
 | |
|      typedef struct {
 | |
|              uint8_t reg;
 | |
|              uint8_t data;
 | |
|      } i2c_ex_regs_t;
 | |
| 
 | |
|      typedef struct {
 | |
|              unsigned int bus;
 | |
|              uint8_t slave;
 | |
|              i2c_ex_regs_t regs[3];
 | |
|      } i2c_ex_devs_t;
 | |
| 
 | |
|      i2c_ex_devs_t i2c_ex_devs[] = {
 | |
|              {.bus = 0, .slave = 0xA, .regs = {
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x0, .data = 0xB},
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x1, .data = 0x6},
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x2, .data = 0xF},
 | |
|              } },
 | |
|              {.bus = 0, .slave = 0x3, .regs = {
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x0, .data = 0xDE},
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x1, .data = 0xAD},
 | |
|                      {.reg = 0x2, .data = 0xBE},
 | |
|              } },
 | |
|      };
 | |
| 
 | |
|    These fake devices will be accessed instead of hardware ones:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|              reg = tmp->buf[0];
 | |
| 
 | |
|              /* Find object for requested device */
 | |
|              for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_ex_devs); i++, i2c_dev++)
 | |
|                      if (i2c_ex_devs[i].slave == tmp->slave) {
 | |
|                              i2c_dev = &i2c_ex_devs[i];
 | |
|                              break;
 | |
|                      }
 | |
| 
 | |
|              if (i2c_dev == NULL)
 | |
|                      return -1;
 | |
| 
 | |
|              /* Write commands */
 | |
|              if (tmp->len > 1) {
 | |
|                      i2c_dev->regs[reg].data = tmp->buf[1];
 | |
|              };
 | |
| 
 | |
|              /* Read commands */
 | |
|              for (i = 0; i < count; i++, tmp++)
 | |
|                      if (tmp->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
 | |
|                              *(tmp->buf) = i2c_dev->regs[reg].data;
 | |
|                      };
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Cmocka uses a feature that gcc provides for breaking dependencies at the
 | |
| link time. It is possible to override implementation of some function,
 | |
| with the method from test harness. This allows test harness to take
 | |
| control of execution from binary (during the execution of test), and
 | |
| stimulate UUT as required without changing the source code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| coreboot unit test infrastructure supports overriding of functions at
 | |
| link time.  This is as simple as adding a `name_of_function` to be
 | |
| mocked into <test_name>-mocks variable in Makefile.inc. The result is
 | |
| that the test's implementation of that function is called instead of
 | |
| coreboot's.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      i2c-test-mocks += platform_i2c_transfer
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Now, dev can write own implementation of `platform_i2c_transfer`.
 | |
|    This implementation instead of accessing real i2c bus, will
 | |
|    write/read from fake structs.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      int platform_i2c_transfer(unsigned int bus, struct i2c_msg
 | |
|                  *segments, int count)
 | |
|      {
 | |
|      }
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Checking mock's arguments
 | |
| A test can verify the parameters provided by the UUT to the mock
 | |
| function. The developer may also verify that number of calls to mock is
 | |
| correct and the order of calls to particular mocks is as expected (See
 | |
| [this](https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka__call__order.html)). The
 | |
| Cmocka macros for checking parameters are described
 | |
| [here](https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka__param.html). In general, in
 | |
| mock function, one makes a call to `check_expected(<param_name>)` and in
 | |
| the corresponding test function, `expect*()` macro, with description
 | |
| which parameter in which mock should have particular value, or be inside
 | |
| a described range.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    In our example, we may want to check that `platform_i2c_transfer` is
 | |
|    fed with number of segments bigger than 0, each segment has flags
 | |
|    which are in supported range and each segment has buf which is
 | |
|    non-NULL. We are expecting such values for _every_ call, thus the
 | |
|    last parameter in `expect*` macros is -1.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      static void mock_expect_params_platform_i2c_transfer(void)
 | |
|      {
 | |
|              unsigned long int expected_flags[] = {0, I2C_M_RD,
 | |
|                      I2C_M_TEN, I2C_M_RECV_LEN, I2C_M_NOSTART};
 | |
| 
 | |
|              /* Flags should always be only within supported range */
 | |
|              expect_in_set_count(platform_i2c_transfer, segments->flags,
 | |
|                      expected_flags, -1);
 | |
| 
 | |
|              expect_not_value_count(platform_i2c_transfer, segments->buf,
 | |
|                      NULL, -1);
 | |
| 
 | |
|              expect_in_range_count(platform_i2c_transfer, count, 1,
 | |
|                      INT_MAX, -1);
 | |
|      }
 | |
| 
 | |
|    And the checks below should be added to our mock
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|              check_expected(count);
 | |
| 
 | |
|              for (i = 0; i < count; i++, segments++) {
 | |
|                      check_expected_ptr(segments->buf);
 | |
|                      check_expected(segments->flags);
 | |
|              }
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Instrument mocks
 | |
| It is possible for the test function to instrument what the mock will
 | |
| return to the UUT. This can be done by using the `will_return*()` and
 | |
| `mock()` macros.  These are described in [the Mock Object
 | |
| section](https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka__mock.html) of the Cmocka
 | |
| API documentation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: Example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    There is an non-coreboot example for using Cmocka available
 | |
|    `here <https://lwn.net/Articles/558106/>`_.
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Test runner
 | |
| Finally, the developer needs to implement the test `main()` function.
 | |
| All tests should be registered there and cmocka test runner invoked. All
 | |
| methods for invoking Cmocka test are described
 | |
| [here](https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka__exec.html).
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```eval_rst
 | |
| .. admonition:: i2c-test example
 | |
| 
 | |
|    We don't need any extra setup and teardown functions for i2c-test, so
 | |
|    let's simply register test for `i2c_read_field` and return from main
 | |
|    value which is output of Cmocka's runner (it returns number of tests
 | |
|    that failed).
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: c
 | |
| 
 | |
|      int main(void)
 | |
|      {
 | |
|              const struct CMUnitTest tests[] = {
 | |
|                      cmocka_unit_test(i2c_read_field_test),
 | |
|              };
 | |
| 
 | |
|              return cb_run_group_tests(tests, NULL, NULL);
 | |
|      }
 | |
| ```
 |