After Opal solution enhance BlockSid solution to consume the TCG PP. This variable and guid definition is deprecated.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
OpalDxe driver already enhanced to use TCG PP to send BlockSid request, so the old variable OPAL_EXTRA_INFO_VAR_NAME is not used by OpalDxe driver. But OpalSmm driver still consume this variable to decide whether need to send BlockSid when S3 resume. This patch fixed this issue by change OpalSmm driver to consume Tcg PP actions.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
MicrocodeDetect function will run by every threads, and it will
use PcdGet to get PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and
PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize, if change both PCD default to dynamic,
system will in non-deterministic behavior.
By design, UEFI/PI services are single threaded and not re-entrant
so Multi processor code should not use UEFI/PI services. Here, Pcd
protocol/PPI is used to access dynamic PCDs so it would result in
non-deterministic behavior.
This code get PCD value in BSP and save them in CPU_MP_DATA for Ap.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726
Cc: Crystal Lee <CrystalLee@ami.com.tw>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1e3f7a3782)
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
OpalPasswordSupportLib and insert AsmLfence API to mitigate the bounds
check bypass issue.
For SMI handler SmmOpalPasswordHandler():
Under "case SMM_FUNCTION_SET_OPAL_PASSWORD:",
'&DeviceBuffer->OpalDevicePath' can points to a potential cross boundary
access of the 'CommBuffer' (controlled external inputs) during speculative
execution. This cross boundary access pointer is later passed as parameter
'DevicePath' into function OpalSavePasswordToSmm().
Within function OpalSavePasswordToSmm(), 'DevicePathLen' is an access to
the content in 'DevicePath' and can be inferred by code:
"CompareMem (&List->OpalDevicePath, DevicePath, DevicePathLen)". One can
observe which part of the content within either '&List->OpalDevicePath' or
'DevicePath' was brought into cache to possibly reveal the value of
'DevicePathLen'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
SmmCorePerformanceLib and insert AsmLfence API to mitigate the bounds
check bypass issue.
For SMI handler SmmPerformanceHandlerEx():
Under "case SMM_PERF_FUNCTION_GET_GAUGE_DATA :",
'SmmPerfCommData->LogEntryKey' can be a potential cross boundary access of
the 'CommBuffer' (controlled external inputs) during speculative
execution. This cross boundary access is then assign to parameter
'LogEntryKey'. And the value of 'LogEntryKey' can be inferred by code:
CopyMem (
(UINT8 *) &GaugeDataEx[Index],
(UINT8 *) &GaugeEntryExArray[LogEntryKey++],
sizeof (GAUGE_DATA_ENTRY_EX)
);
One can observe which part of the content within 'GaugeEntryExArray' was
brought into cache to possibly reveal the value of 'LogEntryKey'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.
And there is 1 similar case for SMI handler SmmPerformanceHandler() as
well. This commit also handles it.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
It is possible for SMI handler(s) to call EFI_SMM_CPU_PROTOCOL service
ReadSaveState() and use the content in the 'CommBuffer' (controlled
external inputs) as the 'CpuIndex'. So this commit will insert AsmLfence
API to mitigate the bounds check bypass issue within SmmReadSaveState().
For SmmReadSaveState():
The 'CpuIndex' will be passed into function ReadSaveStateRegister(). And
then in to ReadSaveStateRegisterByIndex().
With the call:
ReadSaveStateRegisterByIndex (
CpuIndex,
SMM_SAVE_STATE_REGISTER_IOMISC_INDEX,
sizeof(IoMisc.Uint32),
&IoMisc.Uint32
);
The 'IoMisc' can be a cross boundary access during speculative execution.
Later, 'IoMisc' is used as the index to access buffers 'mSmmCpuIoWidth'
and 'mSmmCpuIoType'. One can observe which part of the content within
those buffers was brought into cache to possibly reveal the value of
'IoMisc'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the check of 'CpuIndex'
within function SmmReadSaveState() to prevent the speculative execution.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5b02be4d9a)
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
Variable\RuntimeDxe driver and insert AsmLfence API to mitigate the
bounds check bypass issue.
For SMI handler SmmVariableHandler():
Under "case SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_GET_VARIABLE:",
'SmmVariableHeader->NameSize' can be a potential cross boundary access of
the 'CommBuffer' (controlled external input) during speculative execution.
This cross boundary access is later used as the index to access array
'SmmVariableHeader->Name' by code:
"SmmVariableHeader->Name[SmmVariableHeader->NameSize/sizeof (CHAR16) - 1]"
One can observe which part of the content within array was brought into
cache to possibly reveal the value of 'SmmVariableHeader->NameSize'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.
And there are 2 similar cases under
"case SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_SET_VARIABLE:" and
"case SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_VAR_CHECK_VARIABLE_PROPERTY_GET:" as well.
This commits also handles them.
Also, under "case SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_SET_VARIABLE:",
'(UINT8 *)SmmVariableHeader->Name + SmmVariableHeader->NameSize' points to
the 'CommBuffer' (with some offset) and then passed as parameter 'Data' to
function VariableServiceSetVariable().
Within function VariableServiceSetVariable(), there is a sanity check for
EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_2 descriptor for the data pointed by 'Data'.
If this check is speculatively bypassed, potential cross-boundary data
access for 'Data' is possible to be revealed via the below function calls
sequence during speculative execution:
AuthVariableLibProcessVariable()
ProcessVarWithPk() or ProcessVarWithKek()
Within function ProcessVarWithPk() or ProcessVarWithKek(), for the code
"PayloadSize = DataSize - AUTHINFO2_SIZE (Data);", 'AUTHINFO2_SIZE (Data)'
can be a cross boundary access during speculative execution.
Then, 'PayloadSize' is possible to be revealed by the function call
sequence:
AuthServiceInternalUpdateVariableWithTimeStamp()
mAuthVarLibContextIn->UpdateVariable()
VariableExLibUpdateVariable()
UpdateVariable()
CopyMem()
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the sanity check for
EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_2 descriptor upon 'Data' within function
VariableServiceSetVariable() to prevent the speculative execution.
Also, please note that the change made within function
VariableServiceSetVariable() will affect DXE as well. However, since we
only focuses on the SMM codes, the commit will introduce a new module
internal function called VariableLoadFence() to handle this. This internal
function will have 2 implementations (1 for SMM, 1 for DXE). For the SMM
implementation, it is a wrapper to call the AsmLfence() API; for the DXE
implementation, it is empty.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit e83d841fdc)
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
SmmLockBox driver and insert AsmLfence API to mitigate the
bounds check bypass issue.
For SMI handler SmmLockBoxHandler():
Under "case EFI_SMM_LOCK_BOX_COMMAND_SAVE:", the 'CommBuffer' (controlled
external inputs) is passed to function SmmLockBoxSave().
'TempLockBoxParameterSave.Length' can be a potential cross boundary access
of the 'CommBuffer' during speculative execution. This cross boundary
access is later passed as parameter 'Length' into function SaveLockBox().
Within function SaveLockBox(), the value of 'Length' can be inferred by
code:
"CopyMem ((VOID *)(UINTN)SmramBuffer, (VOID *)(UINTN)Buffer, Length);".
One can observe which part of the content within 'Buffer' was brought into
cache to possibly reveal the value of 'Length'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.
And there is a similar case under "case EFI_SMM_LOCK_BOX_COMMAND_UPDATE:"
function SmmLockBoxUpdate() as well. This commits also handles it.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee65b84e76)
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194
Speculative execution is used by processor to avoid having to wait for
data to arrive from memory, or for previous operations to finish, the
processor may speculate as to what will be executed.
If the speculation is incorrect, the speculatively executed instructions
might leave hints such as which memory locations have been brought into
cache. Malicious actors can use the bounds check bypass method (code
gadgets with controlled external inputs) to infer data values that have
been used in speculative operations to reveal secrets which should not
otherwise be accessed.
This commit will focus on the SMI handler(s) registered within the
FaultTolerantWriteDxe driver and insert AsmLfence API to mitigate the
bounds check bypass issue.
For SMI handler SmmFaultTolerantWriteHandler():
Under "case FTW_FUNCTION_WRITE:", 'SmmFtwWriteHeader->Length' can be a
potential cross boundary access of the 'CommBuffer' (controlled external
inputs) during speculative execution. This cross boundary access is later
passed as parameter 'Length' into function FtwWrite().
Within function FtwWrite(), the value of 'Length' can be inferred by code:
"CopyMem (MyBuffer + Offset, Buffer, Length);". One can observe which part
of the content within 'Buffer' was brought into cache to possibly reveal
the value of 'Length'.
Hence, this commit adds a AsmLfence() after the boundary/range checks of
'CommBuffer' to prevent the speculative execution.
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Bounds check bypass mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
And the document at:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/api-app/sites/default/files/337879-analyzing-potential-bounds-Check-bypass-vulnerabilities.pdf
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit cb54cd2463)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Return Stack Buffer (RSB) is used to predict the target of RET
instructions. When the RSB underflows, some processors may fall back to
using branch predictors. This might impact software using the retpoline
mitigation strategy on those processors.
This commit will add RSB stuffing logic before returning from SMM (the RSM
instruction) to avoid interfering with non-SMM usage of the retpoline
technique.
After the stuffing, RSB entries will contain a trap like:
@SpecTrap:
pause
lfence
jmp @SpecTrap
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Branch target injection mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
Please note that this commit requires further actions (BZ 1091) to remove
the duplicated 'StuffRsb.inc' files and merge them into one under a
UefiCpuPkg package-level directory (such as UefiCpuPkg/Include/).
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1091
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0df5056012)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Return Stack Buffer (RSB) is used to predict the target of RET
instructions. When the RSB underflows, some processors may fall back to
using branch predictors. This might impact software using the retpoline
mitigation strategy on those processors.
This commit will add RSB stuffing logic before returning from SMM (the RSM
instruction) to avoid interfering with non-SMM usage of the retpoline
technique.
After the stuffing, RSB entries will contain a trap like:
@SpecTrap:
pause
lfence
jmp @SpecTrap
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Branch target injection mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
Please note that this commit requires further actions (BZ 1091) to remove
the duplicated 'StuffRsb.inc' files and merge them into one under a
UefiCpuPkg package-level directory (such as UefiCpuPkg/Include/).
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1091
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 02f7fd158e)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169
PCI spec:
They are also required to always implement function 0 in the device.
Implementing other functions is optional and may be assigned in any
order (i.e., a two-function device must respond to function 0 but
can choose any of the other possible function numbers (1-7) for the
second function).
This patch updates ScanPciBus() to not scan other functions if
function 0 is not implemented.
Test done:
Added debug code below in the second loop of ScanPciBus(),
compared the debug logs with and without this patch, many
non-0 unimplemented functions are skipped correctly.
DEBUG ((
DEBUG_INFO,
"%a() B%02xD%02xF%02x VendorId: %04x DeviceId: %04x\n",
__FUNCTION__,
Bus,
Device,
Function,
VendorID,
DeviceID
));
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
Cc: Tomson Chang <tomson.chang@intel.com>
Cc: Jenny Huang <jenny.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Amy Chan <amy.chan@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit e69d7e99e7)
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415
When SetVariable() to a time based auth variable with APPEND_WRITE
attribute, and if the EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_2.TimeStamp in
the input Data is earlier than current value, it will cause timestamp
zeroing.
This issue may bring time based auth variable downgrade problem.
For example:
A vendor released three certs at 2014, 2015, and 2016, and system
integrated the 2016 cert. User can SetVariable() with 2015 cert and
APPEND_WRITE attribute to cause timestamp zeroing first, then
SetVariable() with 2014 cert to downgrade the cert.
This patch fixes this issue.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit b7dc8888f3)
Commit f6b139b added return status handling to PciIo->Mem.Write.
However, the second status handling will override EFI_DEVICE_ERROR
returned in this branch:
//
// Check the NVMe cmd execution result
//
if (Status != EFI_TIMEOUT) {
if ((Cq->Sct == 0) && (Cq->Sc == 0)) {
Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
} else {
Status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Since PciIo->Mem.Write will probably return SUCCESS, it causes
NvmExpressPassThru to return SUCCESS even when DEVICE_ERROR occurs.
Callers of NvmExpressPassThru will then continue executing which may
cause further unexpected results, e.g. DiscoverAllNamespaces couldn't
break out the loop.
So we save previous status before calling PciIo->Mem.Write and restore
the previous one if it already contains error.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9a77210b43)
Current code not check the CommunicationBuffer size before use it. Attacker can
read beyond the end of the (untrusted) commbuffer into controlled memory. Attacker
can get access outside of valid SMM memory regions. This patch add check before
use it.
bugz: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Wu Hao <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
1) UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpu: Check for untested memory in GCD
It treats GCD untested memory as invalid SMM
communication buffer.
2) UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpu: Check EFI_RUNTIME_RO in UEFI mem attrib table.
It treats the UEFI runtime page with EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute as
invalid SMM communication buffer.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
We want to provide precise info in MemAttribTable
to both OS and SMM, and SMM only gets the info at EndOfDxe.
So we do not update RtCode entry in EndOfDxe.
The impact is that if 3rd part OPROM is runtime, it cannot be executed
at UEFI runtime phase.
Currently, we do not see compatibility issue, because the only runtime
OPROM we found before in UNDI, and UEFI OS will not use UNDI interface
in OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
So that the SMM can consume it to set page protection for
the UEFI runtime page with EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
It treats the UEFI runtime page with EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute as
invalid SMM communication buffer.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
It treats GCD untested memory as invalid SMM
communication buffer.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
d69d9227d0 caused system firmware update
failure. It is because FindMatchingFmpHandles() is expected to return
handles matched, but the function returns all handles found.
This patch is to fix the issue.
This patch also assigns mSystemFmpPrivate->Handle for "case 1:" path
in case the Handle is needed by other place in future.
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 665bfd41ac)
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928
Uninstall all System FMP Protocols for the current FW device.
If an FMP Protocol for the current FW device is already present,
then install the new System FMP protocol onto the same handle as
the FMP Protocol. Otherwise, install the FMP protocol onto a
new handle.
This supports use cases where multiple capsules for the
same system firmware device are processed on the same
boot of the platform. It guarantees there is at most one
FMP protocol for each system firmware device.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit d69d9227d0)
Update package format info in _PRS to TcgNvs after memory is allocated.
Change-Id: Icfadb350e60d3ed2df332e92c257ce13309c0018
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1ea08a3dcd)
(cherry picked from commit fb8254478f7259d22d8433f6729307e001b81bdd)
UEFI Spec uses UnRegisterResetNotify in protocol structure
definition but uses UnregisterResetNotify in the function
prototype definition.
By searching the entire spec, Unregister* is used for
SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX_PROTOCOL.UnregisterKeyNotify(). So choose
to use UnregisterResetNotify for consistency.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit fcccba378b)
The PeriodicSmiDispatchFunction() in SmmPeriodicSmiLib may assert
with "Bad CR signature".
Currently, the SetActivePeriodicSmiLibraryHandler() function
(invoked at the beginning of the PeriodicSmiDispatchFunction()
function) attempts to locate the PERIODIC_SMI_LIBRARY_HANDLER_CONTEXT
structure pointer for the current periodic SMI from a given
EFI_SMM_PERIODIC_TIMER_REGISTER_CONTEXT (RegiserContext) structure
pointer (using the CR macro).
The RegisterContext structure pointer passed to the
PeriodicSmiDispatchFunction() is assumed to point to the same
RegisterContext structure address given to the
SmmPeriodicTimerDispatch2 protocol Register() API in
PeriodicSmiEnable().
However, certain SmmPeriodicTimerDispatch2 implementation may copy
the RegisterContext to a local buffer and pass that address as the
context to PeriodicSmiDispatchFunction() in which case usage of the
CR macro to find the parent structure base fails.
The patch uses the LookupPeriodicSmiLibraryHandler() function to
find the PERIODIC_SMI_LIBRARY_HANDLER_CONTEXT structure pointer.
This works even in this scenario since the DispatchHandle returned
from the SmmPeriodicTimerDispatch2 Register() function uniquely
identifies that registration.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1e35fcc9ee)
When source level debug is enabled, but debug cable is not connected,
XhcResetHC() in XhciReg.c will reset the host controller, the debug
capability registers will be also reset. After the code in
InitializeUsbDebugHardware() sets DCE bit and LSE bit to "1" in DCCTRL,
there will be DMA on 0 (the value of some debug capability registers
for data transfer is 0) address buffer, fault info like below will
appear when IOMMU based on VTd is enabled.
VER_REG - 0x00000010
CAP_REG - 0x00D2008C40660462
ECAP_REG - 0x0000000000F050DA
GSTS_REG - 0xC0000000
RTADDR_REG - 0x0000000086512000
CCMD_REG - 0x2800000000000000
FSTS_REG - 0x00000002
FECTL_REG - 0xC0000000
FEDATA_REG - 0x00000000
FEADDR_REG - 0x00000000
FEUADDR_REG - 0x00000000
FRCD_REG[0] - 0xC0000006000000A0 0000000000000000
Fault Info - 0x0000000000000000
Source - B00 D14 F00
Type - 1 (read)
Reason - 6
IVA_REG - 0x0000000000000000
IOTLB_REG - 0x1200000000000000
This patch is to return error for the case.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit df67a480eb)
de8373fa07 could not handle two cases.
1. For the case that the USB3 debug port instance and DMA buffers are
from PEI HOB with IOMMU enabled, it was to reallocate the DMA buffers
by AllocateAddress with the memory type accessible by SMM environment.
But reallocating the DMA buffers by AllocateAddress may fail.
2. At S3 resume, after the code is transferred to PiSmmCpuDxeSmm from
S3Resume2Pei, HOB is still needed to be used for DMA operation, but
PiSmmCpuDxeSmm has no way to get the HOB at S3 resume.
The patch is to re-support IOMMU.
For PEI, allocate granted DMA buffer from IOMMU PPI, register IOMMU PPI
notification to reinitialize hardware with granted DMA buffer if IOMMU
PPI is not present yet.
For DXE, map DMA buffer by PciIo in PciIo notification for early DXE,
and register DxeSmmReadyToLock notification to reinitialize hardware
with granted DXE DMA buffer accessible by SMM environment for late DXE.
DebugAgentLib has been managing the instance as Handle in
HOB/SystemTable. The Handle(instance) from DebugAgentLib can be used
directly in DebugCommunicationLibUsb3. Then DebugCommunicationLibUsb3
could get consistent Handle(instance) from DebugAgentLib.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 75787f6580)
Fix GCC build failures below.
variable 'EvtTrb' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
variable 'Index' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
The build failure could only be caught with -D SOURCE_DEBUG_USE_USB3
build flag.
ad6040ec9b needs to be also reverted
when reverting IOMMU support patches, otherwise there will be conflict.
This patch is to re-do ad6040ec9b.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3ecca00330)
Fix GCC build failures below.
variable 'EvtTrb' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
variable 'Index' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
The build failure could only be caught with -D SOURCE_DEBUG_USE_USB3
build flag.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit ad6040ec9b)
