V2: Add --target-name to specify the file name to create
Because Ecc.py was renamed to EccMain.py
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In commit 81502cee20 ("BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the
caller", 2018-08-16), I missed that "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" does not use
BUILD_LFLAGS in the APPLICATION linking rule, unlike "app.makefile" does.
Instead, "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" uses the (undefined) LFLAGS macro.
Therefore commit 81502cee20 did not cover the linking step of
VfrCompile.
Thankfully, the structure of the linking rules is the same, between
"app.makefile" and "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile". Rename the undefined LFLAGS
macro in "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" to VFR_LFLAGS (for consistency with
VFR_CXXFLAGS), and set it to EXTRA_LDFLAGS.
As a result, we have:
| compilation | linking
-----------+--------------------------------+----------------------
VfrCompile | VFR_CXXFLAGS = | VFR_LFLAGS =
| BUILD_OPTFLAGS = | EXTRA_LDFLAGS
| '-O2' + EXTRA_OPTFLAGS |
-----------+--------------------------------+----------------------
other apps | BUILD_CFLAGS/BUILD_CXXFLAGS = | BUILD_LFLAGS =
| [...] + BUILD_OPTFLAGS = | [...] + EXTRA_LDFLAGS
| [...] + '-O2' + EXTRA_OPTFLAGS |
This table shows
- that the VfrCompile compilation and linking flags are always a subset of
the corresponding flags used by the other apps,
- and that the EXTRA flags are always at the end.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Fixes: 81502cee20
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
While reviewing the patch that would land as 768b611136
("MdePkg/UefiLib: introduce EfiOpenFileByDevicePath()", 2018-08-16), Ray
pointed out that distinguishing EFI_FILE_MODE_CREATE was wasteful. Per
spec, if the file to create exists, then EFI_FILE_MODE_CREATE is ignored
by EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL.Open(), and the existent file is opened.
Therefore we don't need an attempt to "open-but-not-create" first, and a
fallback to "open-and-create-too" second -- that behavior is internal to
EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL.Open(). Remove the special-casing of
EFI_FILE_MODE_CREATE.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1074
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
1.After the cleanup at "MdeModulePkg UiApp: Remove redundant functions",
the function "IsResetReminderFeatureEnable()" and the variable
"mFeaturerSwitch" become redundant so they have been removed.
2.Therefore, the "IF" expression has also been removed, whose judgment condition
is "IsResetReminderFeatureEnable()".
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The functions that are never called have been removed.
They are IsImageInsideSmram,FindImageRecord,SmmRemoveImageRecord,
SmmMemoryAttributesTableConsistencyCheck,DumpSmmMemoryMapEntry,
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheckRange,SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheck,
DumpSmmMemoryMap,ClearGuardMapBit,SetGuardMapBit,AdjustMemoryA,
AdjustMemoryS,IsHeadGuard and IsTailGuard.
FindImageRecord() is called by SmmRemoveImageRecord(); however,
nothing calls SmmRemoveImageRecord().
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheckRange() is called by
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheck(); however, nothing calls
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheck().
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
v2:append the following to the commit message.
- FindImageRecord() is called by SmmRemoveImageRecord(); however,
nothing calls SmmRemoveImageRecord().
- SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheckRange() is called by
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheck(); however, nothing calls
SmmMemoryMapConsistencyCheck().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The functions that are never called have been removed.
They are UfsPeimUnlinkMemBlock,UfsPeimRequestSense,
UfsPeimInquiry,UfsRwAttributes,UfsClearFlag,UfsReadFlag
and UfsFindAvailableSlotInTmrl.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
v2: Remove the comment that mentioned 'UfsPeimUnlinkMemBlock'
within function UfsPeimFreeMemPool().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Return Stack Buffer (RSB) is used to predict the target of RET
instructions. When the RSB underflows, some processors may fall back to
using branch predictors. This might impact software using the retpoline
mitigation strategy on those processors.
This commit will add RSB stuffing logic before returning from SMM (the RSM
instruction) to avoid interfering with non-SMM usage of the retpoline
technique.
After the stuffing, RSB entries will contain a trap like:
@SpecTrap:
pause
lfence
jmp @SpecTrap
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Branch target injection mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
Please note that this commit requires further actions (BZ 1091) to remove
the duplicated 'StuffRsb.inc' files and merge them into one under a
UefiCpuPkg package-level directory (such as UefiCpuPkg/Include/).
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1091
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Return Stack Buffer (RSB) is used to predict the target of RET
instructions. When the RSB underflows, some processors may fall back to
using branch predictors. This might impact software using the retpoline
mitigation strategy on those processors.
This commit will add RSB stuffing logic before returning from SMM (the RSM
instruction) to avoid interfering with non-SMM usage of the retpoline
technique.
After the stuffing, RSB entries will contain a trap like:
@SpecTrap:
pause
lfence
jmp @SpecTrap
A more detailed explanation of the purpose of commit is under the
'Branch target injection mitigation' section of the below link:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/host-firmware-speculative-execution-side-channel-mitigation
Please note that this commit requires further actions (BZ 1091) to remove
the duplicated 'StuffRsb.inc' files and merge them into one under a
UefiCpuPkg package-level directory (such as UefiCpuPkg/Include/).
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1091
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The issue was found when heap guard is turned on.
PrintLib somehow receives a non-null terminated string in var-arg.
When the PrintLib implementation reads the string it keeps
reading because no null-terminator is met, which triggers the page
fault set by the heap guard.
The issue is caused by a bug in FileBufferPrintLine().
When "edit" opens a binary file, in FileBufferPrintLine(),
the Line->Buffer may start with \x00 \x00, but the Line->Size is
larger than MainEditor.ScreenSize.Column, it causes the PrintLine is
set to an empty string by below call:
StrnCpyS (
PrintLine, BufLen/sizeof(CHAR16), Buffer,
MIN(Limit, MainEditor.ScreenSize.Column)
);
But since Limit (equals to Line->Size) is larger than
MainEditor.ScreenSize.Column, below for-loop doesn't successfully
set the whole PrintLine to all-empty-space.
for (; Limit < MainEditor.ScreenSize.Column; Limit++) {
PrintLine[Limit] = L' ';
}
So after the for-loop, PrintLine is still an empty string.
Later in below call, the PrintLine2 is created based on PrintLine.
ShellCopySearchAndReplace (
PrintLine, PrintLine2,
BufLen * 2, L"%", L"^%", FALSE, FALSE
);
But due to the implementation of ShellCopySearchAndReplace(),
PrintLine2 is untouched and INVALID_PARAMETER is returned.
Finally an uninitialized string is passed to ShellPrintEx()
which causes the #PF exception.
The fix is to reset Limit to StrLen(PrintLine) before for-loop.
So that PrintLine can be converted from an empty string to a
string containing all spaces.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Don't iterate over new dictionaries with one item
Create the data and then add to dictionary.
Note: if you diff ignoring whitespace changes you
can more easily see the relevant changes.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
MakeFile generation is once per module, so mark it as such.
also move the time stamp creation function inside as it's
only called from one place.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
