Selecting CPU_X86_CACHE_HELPER only added the x86_enable_cache wrapper
function around enable_cache which additionally wrote a POST code to
port 0x80 and printed a message to the console. This function was only
called during multi-processor initialization in ramstage via the init
function pointer in the CPU's device operations struct and was run on
all cores, so the message on the console was printed once per CPU core.
This patch replaces all x86_enable_cache calls by calls to enable_cache
and removes the wrapper function and the Kconfig symbol
CPU_X86_CACHE_HELPER which was used to only add this when the
corresponding CPUs used the x86_enable_cache wrapper function.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Suggested-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I5866b6bf014821ff9e3a48052a5eaf69319b003a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58579
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since all x86 CPUs in tree have MTRR support, there is no need to guard
the DISPLAY_MTRRS option with HAVE_DISPLAY_MTRRS. Also all x86 CPUs/SoCs
have a display_mtrrs call at least somewhere in their code, so selecting
the DISPLAY_MTRRS option will always have an effect. All SoCs that don't
select RESET_VECTOR_IN_RAM have the postcar stage where it gets called.
The two AMD SoCs that select RESET_VECTOR_IN_RAM use the FSP2 driver
which contains plenty of display_mtrrs calls.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I2894689ce58e7404d9d5a894f3c288bc4016ea19
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51575
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
With using a Kconfig option to add the x86 LAPIC support code to the
build, there's no need for adding the corresponding directory to subdirs
in the CPU/SoC Makefile. Comparing which CPU/SoC Makefiles added
(cpu/)x86/mtrr and (cpu/)x86/lapic before this and the corresponding
MTRR code selection patch and having verified that all platforms
added the MTRR code on that patch shows that soc/example/min86 and
soc/intel/quark are the only platforms that don't end up selecting the
LAPIC code. So for now the default value of CPU_X86_LAPIC is chosen as y
which gets overridden to n in the Kconfig of the two SoCs mentioned
above.
Change-Id: I6f683ea7ba92c91117017ebc6ad063ec54902b0a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44228
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
All x86-based CPUs and SoCs in the coreboot tree end up including the
Makefile in cpu/x86/mtrr, so include this directly in the Makefile in
cpu/x86 to add it for all x86 CPUs/SoCs. In the unlikely case that a new
x86 CPU/SoC will be added, a CPU_X86_MTRR Kconfig option that is
selected be default could be added and the new CPU/SoC without MTRR
support can override this option that then will be used in the Makefile
to guard adding the Makefile from the cpu/x86/mtrr sub-directory.
In cpu/intel all models except model 2065X and 206AX are selcted by a
socket and rely on the socket's Makefile.inc to add x86/mtrr to the
subdirs, so those models don't add x86/mtrr themselves. The Intel
Broadwell SoC selects CPU_INTEL_HASWELL and which added x86/mtrr to the
subdirs. The Intel Xeon SP SoC directory contains two sub-folders for
different versions or generations which both add x86/mtrr to the subdirs
in their Makefiles.
Change-Id: I743eaac99a85a5c712241ba48a320243c5a51f76
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44230
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Each CPU/SoC checks the return value of the mp_init_with_smm and prints
the same error message if it wasn't successful, so move this check and
printk to mp_init_with_smm. For this the original mp_init_with_smm
function gets renamed to do_mp_init_with_smm and a new mp_init_with_smm
function is created which then calls do_mp_init_with_smm, prints the
error if it didn't return CB_SUCCESS and passes the return value of
do_mp_init_with_smm to its caller.
Since no CPU/SoC code handles a mp_init_with_smm failure apart from
printing a message, also add a comment at the mp_init_with_smm call
sites that the code might want to handle a failure.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I181602723c204f3e43eb43302921adf7a88c81ed
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58498
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Using cb_err as return type of mp_run_on_aps, mp_run_on_all_aps,
mp_run_on_all_cpus and mp_park_aps clarifies the meaning of the
different return values. This patch also adds the types.h include that
provides the definition of the cb_err enum and checks the return value
of all 4 functions listed above against the enum values instead of
either checking if it's non-zero or less than zero to handle the error
case.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4b3f03415a041d3ec9cd0e102980e53868b004b0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58494
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Using cb_err as return type clarifies the meaning of the different
return values. This patch also adds the types.h include that provides
the definition of the cb_err enum and checks the return value of
mp_init_with_smm against the enum values instead of either checking if
it's non-zero or less than zero to handle the error case.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ibcd4a9a63cc87fe176ba885ced0f00832587d492
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58491
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Some elements in the ACPI CPPC table allow static DWORDs. Instead of
using a fake register resource, use a tagged union with the two types
"register" and "DWORD" and respective macros for CPPC table entries.
Test: dumped SSDT before and after do not differ.
Change-Id: Ib853261b5c0ea87ae2424fed188f2d1872be9a06
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57886
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Using cb_err as return type clarifies the meaning of the different
return values. To not change the return types of mp_run_on_aps which is
exposed outside of this compilation unit to keep the scope of this patch
limited, the return value of run_ap_work gets translated to the int
values in mp_run_on_aps. This could also be done by a cast of the
run_ap_work return value to int, but an explicit translation of the
return values should be clearer about what it does there.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Id346c8edf06229a929b4783498d8c6774f54a8b1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58490
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Using cb_err as return type clarifies the meaning of the different
return values. To not change the return types of mp_init_with_smm which
is exposed outside of this compilation unit to keep the scope of this
patch limited, the return value of mp_init gets translated to the int
values in mp_init_with_smm. This could also be done by a cast of the
mp_init return value to int, but an explicit translation of the return
values should be clearer about what it does there.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4129c1db06a877c47cca87782af965b62dcbbdc2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58489
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
We now pre-populate cpu_info before jumping to the C handler. We no
longer need this parameter.
I moved the stack alignment closer to the actual invocation of the C
handler so it's easier to reason about.
BUG=b:194391185, b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush to OS and verify all CPUs still function
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I8997683b6613b7031784cabf7039a400f0efdea1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58147
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
This will reduce the number of AP init paths we need to support.
BUG=b:194391185, b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush to OS and see all CPUs initialized correctly
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I05beb591bd7b3a26b6c51c10d4ffd6f8621c12eb
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58146
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
There are two possible code sections where the cpu_info macros can be
included: .code32 and .code64
Doing a `push %eax` while in a .code64 section will result in a compiler
error. This macro manually pushes the 32-bit register onto the stack so
we can share the code between 32 and 64 bit builds.
We also can't implicitly dereference per_cpu_segment_selector because
it's a 32-bit address. Trying to do this results in the following:
E: Invalid reloc type: 11
E: Illegal use of 32bit sign extended addressing at offset 0x1b2
If we load the address first, then dereference it, we can work around
the limitation.
With these fixes, 64-bit builds can now use CPU_INFO_V2.
BUG=b:179699789
TEST=Boot qemu 64 bit build with CPU_INFO_V2 and 4 CPUs. See AP init
work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4e72a808c9583bb2d0f697cbbd9cb9c0aa0ea2dc
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58232
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
When CONFIG_X86_AMD_INIT_SIPI was set, the second/final SIPI that
afterwards checks if all APs have checked in was skipped and if it got
so far, start_aps returned CB_SUCCESS despite not having checked if all
APs had checked in after the SIPI. This patch makes start_aps skip the
first SIPI in the CONFIG_X86_AMD_INIT_SIPI case so we use the proper
timeouts and error handling for the final and this case only SIPI and
signal the caller an error when not all APs have checked in after the
SIPI.
A timeless build for lenovo/x230 which is a mainboard that doesn't
select X86_AMD_INIT_SIPI results in identical binary, so this doesn't
change the behavior of the !X86_AMD_INIT_SIPI case.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I39438229497c5d9c44dc7e247c7b2c81252b4bdb
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58456
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Since during AP startup it's not guaranteed that no AP console output
will be printed between consecutive printk calls in send_sipi_to_aps,
add a new line character to all printks to make sure to have the outputs
from the APs on separate lines. For consistency also add a final new
line character to the printk call in start_aps.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I3983b8a0e6b272ba5fb2a90a108d17a0c480c8b8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58454
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The push/pop of %ebx was only added because smm_stub saves the canary
value in it. Now that we no longer use cpu_info in smm, we no longer
need to save the register.
BUG=b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush to the OS
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I554dbe016db8b1c61246c8ffc7fa252b2542ba92
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58205
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Now that cpu_info() is no longer used by COOP_MULTITASKING, we no
longer need to set up cpu_info in SMM. When using CPU_INFO_V2, if
something does manage to call cpu_info() while executing in SMM mode,
the %gs segment is disabled, so it will generate an exception.
BUG=b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush to OS with threads enabled
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Id64f32cc63082880a92dab6deb473431b2238cd0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58204
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
We only ever start and execute threads on the BSP. By explicitly
checking to see if the CPU is the BSP we can remove the dependency on
cpu_info. With this change we can in theory enable threads in all
stages.
BUG=b:194391185, b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush to OS and verify coop multithreading still works
Suggested-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Iea4622d52c36d529e100b7ea55f32c334acfdf3e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58199
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
For older CPU models where CPUID leaf 0xb is not supported, use
initial LAPIC ID from CPUID instead of LAPIC register space to
to detect if logical CPU is a hyperthreading sibling. The one
in LAPIC space is more complex to read, and might not reflect
CPU topology as it can be modified in XAPIC mode.
Change-Id: I8c458824db1ea66948126622a3e0d0604e391e4b
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58385
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Remove code, which was only needed for B and C2 stepping
of P54C. The linux kernel source has commentary on X86_BUG_11AP:
* See if we have a good local APIC by checking for buggy Pentia,
* i.e. all B steppings and the C2 stepping of P54C when using their
* integrated APIC (see 11AP erratum in "Pentium Processor
* Specification Update")
Change-Id: Iec10335f603674bcef2e7494831cf11200795d38
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55199
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Make use of the newly introduced ACPI macros for CPPC table generation
that currently exists of a bunch of confusing assignments of structs
that only get partially filled.
Test: dumped SSDT before and after do not differ.
Change-Id: I844d191b1134b98e409240ede71e2751e51e2159
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
There is currently a fundamental flaw in the current cpu_info()
implementation. It assumes that current stack is CONFIG_STACK_SIZE
aligned. This assumption breaks down when performing SMM relocation.
The first step in performing SMM relocation is changing the SMBASE. This
is accomplished by installing the smmstub at 0x00038000, which is the
default SMM entry point. The stub is configured to set up a new stack
with the size of 1 KiB (CONFIG_SMM_STUB_STACK_SIZE), and an entry point
of smm_do_relocation located in RAMSTAGE RAM.
This means that when smm_do_relocation is executed, it is running in SMM
with a different sized stack. When cpu_info() gets called it will be
using CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to calculate the location of the cpu_info
struct. This results in reading random memory. Since cpu_info() has to
run in multiple environments, we can't use a compile time constant to
locate the cpu_info struct.
This CL introduces a new way of locating cpu_info. It uses a per-cpu
segment descriptor that points to a per-cpu segment that is allocated on
the stack. By using a segment descriptor to point to the per-cpu data,
we no longer need to calculate the location of the cpu_info struct. This
has the following advantages:
* Stacks no longer need to be CONFIG_STACK_SIZE aligned.
* Accessing an unconfigured segment will result in an exception. This
ensures no one can call cpu_info() from an unsupported environment.
* Segment selectors are cleared when entering SMM and restored when
leaving SMM.
* There is a 1:1 mapping between cpu and cpu_info. When using
COOP_MULTITASKING, a new cpu_info is currently allocated at the top of
each thread's stack. This no longer needs to happen.
This CL guards most of the code with CONFIG(CPU_INFO_V2). I did this so
reviewers can feel more comfortable knowing most of the CL is a no-op. I
would eventually like to remove most of the guards though.
This CL does not touch the LEGACY_SMP_INIT code path. I don't have any
way of testing it.
The %gs segment was chosen over the %fs segment because it's what the
linux kernel uses for per-cpu data in x86_64 mode.
BUG=b:194391185, b:179699789
TEST=Boot guybrush with CPU_INFO_V2 and verify BSP and APs have correct
%gs segment. Verify cpu_info looks sane. Verify booting to the OS
works correctly with COOP_MULTITASKING enabled.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I79dce9597cb784acb39a96897fb3c2f2973bfd98
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57627
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Peers <epeers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
