This patch configures max Pkg C-state to Auto which limits the max
C-state to deep C-state.
Port of commit af42906efa ("soc/intel/alderlake: Set max Pkg C-states
to Auto")
BUG=none
TEST=Boot to the OS on Google/Rex.
Snippet from FSP log:
[SPEW ] PkgCStateLimit : 0xFF
Signed-off-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
Change-Id: Ic403ab83a594b04920d5cf600432939687a2598b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
The patch addresses Intel heterogeneous cores as `Efficient` and
`Performance` cores instead of `small` and `big` cores. It is to ensure
coreboot code has uniform reference to the heterogeneous cores. So, the
patch renames all `small` and `big` core references to `efficient` (eff)
and `performance` (perf) cores respectively.
TEST=Build the code for Brya and Rex boards
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Siricilla <sridhar.siricilla@intel.com>
Change-Id: I98c9c0ed86b211d736a0a1738b47410faa13a39f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71639
Reviewed-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Add below mentioned functions:
is_sgx_configured_and_supported():
Checks if SGX is configured and supported
is_keylocker_configured_and_supported():
Checks if Key Locker is configured and supported
check_prm_features_enabled():
Checks if any of the features that need PRM are configured
and supported. As of now SGX and Key Locker are the only
features that need PRM.
Also, call check_prm_features_enabled() from get_valid_prmrr_size()
to make sure PRM dependent features are enabled and configured before
returning PRMRR size.
Signed-off-by: Pratikkumar Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Change-Id: I51d3c144c410ce4c736f10e3759c7b7603ec3de9
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71569
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
BUG=none
TEST=Verify presence of subsystem ID for fast_spi device on google/rex.
lspci output before this patch:
00:1f.5 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:7e23]
lspci output after this patch:
00:1f.5 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:7e23]
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:7e23]
Note: UPD SiSkipSsidProgramming was set to 1 for above test.
Signed-off-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
Change-Id: I08c7a5a3fdc7389b315e85180c16d1ec335fbba2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71275
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
For some reason, the Windows LPEA drivers won't attach without
_HRV (hardware version) defined for the GPIO controllers.
Add it, using value taken from Intel baytrail/valleyview edk2
reference code.
TEST=boot Windows 10/11 on google/rambi, verify LPEA drivers load
properly.
Change-Id: Iaa6e1b3f68537e012e4a58175d5334a8aa2f4178
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
For some reason, the Windows i2c drivers won't attach without
_HRV (hardware version) defined for the i2c controllers.
Add it, using value taken from Intel baytrail/valleyview edk2
reference code.
TEST=boot Windows 10/11 on google/rambi, verify i2c drivers load
properly.
Change-Id: I590acd1f1b75f6bf2bf278e67eec1dcc24bcc15d
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71199
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
To deprecate VBOOT_VBNV_CMOS [1], replace VBOOT_VBNV_CMOS with
VBOOT_VBNV_FLASH for boards using SOC_INTEL_BRASWELL.
Currently BOOT_DEVICE_SPI_FLASH_NO_EARLY_WRITES is selected for
CPU_INTEL_HASWELL, SOC_INTEL_BRASWELL and others (see [2]). However,
there seems to be no particular reason on those platforms. We've dropped
the config for haswell. Now do the same for SOC_INTEL_BRASWELL, so that
VBOOT_VBNV_FLASH can be enabled.
VBOOT_VBNV_FLASH is enabled for the following boards:
- facebook/fbg1701: A 0x2000 RW_NVRAM region is allocated, with the
FW_MAIN_A(CBFS) size reduced by 0x2000.
- google/cyan, intel/strago: Repurpose RW_UNUSED as RW_NVRAM.
[1] https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/235293589
[2] commit 6c2568f4f5
("drivers/spi: Add BOOT_DEVICE_SPI_FLASH_NO_EARLY_WRITES config")
BUG=b:235293589
TEST=./util/abuild/abuild -t FACEBOOK_FBG1701 -a (with VBOOT selected)
TEST=./util/abuild/abuild -x -t GOOGLE_CYAN -a
TEST=./util/abuild/abuild -x -t INTEL_STRAGO -a
Change-Id: I46542c2887b254f59245f20b8642b023a7871708
Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71544
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik van den Bogaert <ebogaert@eltan.com>
Replace the intelblocks/gpio.h and soc/gpio.h includes with the
common gpio.h which will include soc/gpio.h which will include
intelblocks/gpio.h
BUG=b:261778357
TEST=Able to build and boot Google/brya.
Change-Id: Ia90a8ea7b4ee125657c7277e3e14018cfe5423a9
Signed-off-by: Dinesh Gehlot <digehlot@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71266
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
1. Replace all pcidev_path_on_root() and is_dev_enabled()
functions combination with is_devfn_enabled().
2. Remove unused local variable of device structure type
(struct device *).
3. Replace pcidev_path_on_root() and dev->enabled check with
is_devfn_enabled() call.
TEST=Able to build and boot without any regression seen on MTL.
Port of 'commit 50134eccbd ("soc/intel/alderlake: Make use
of is_devfn_enabled() function")'
Signed-off-by: Dinesh Gehlot <digehlot@google.com>
Change-Id: I54bbd2bdba69a19e0559738035916fa7ac60faaa
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71161
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
This patch moves API "smbios_cpu_get_max_speed_mhz()"
to common code from board specific. This API was made
generic in 'commit d34364bdea ("soc/intel/alderlake:
Utilize `CPU_BCLK_MHZ` over dedicated macro")'
BUG=NONE
TEST=Boot and verified that SMBIOS max speed value is
correct on brya and rex.
(brya) dmidecode -t : "Max Speed: 4400 MHz"
(rex) dmidecode -t : "Max Speed: 3400 MHz"
Signed-off-by: Dinesh Gehlot <digehlot@google.com>
Change-Id: I87040ab23319097287e191d7fc9579f16d716e62
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/70879
Reviewed-by: Johnny Lin <Johnny_Lin@wiwynn.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
With enabling FSP Notify Phase APIs, it has chance to issue a global
reset in FSP after CSE EOP (with selecting SOC_INTEL_CSE_SEND_EOP_EARLY
), which CSE already in idle mode and cause failure. For this reason we
should drop SOC_INTEL_CSE_SEND_EOP_EARLY in all ADL sku and select
SOC_INTEL_CSE_SEND_EOP_LATE instead.
BUG=b:261544011
BRANCH=firmware-brya-14505.B
TEST=tested and verified on Marasov, make sure this kind of global
reset can be executed successfully.
Signed-off-by: Tracy Wu <tracy.wu@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I29736ca8efee64dd03feb48404241ee6295b7c72
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71224
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
On broadwell devices, coreboot currently disables and hides the ME PCI
interface by default, without any way to opt out of this behavior.
Add a Kconfig option to allow for leaving the ME PCI interface
enabled, but set the default to disabled as to leave the current
behavior unchanged.
Change-Id: If670d548c46834740f4e21bb2361b537807c32bf
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71196
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
The current implementation of the MCRS had several issues with BARs
and MMCONF not being available:
[ 0.156231] pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 2: assigned to efifb
[ 0.165302] pci 0000:00:18.2: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0xddffc000-0xddffcfff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
[ 0.192896] pci 0000:00:18.2: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x280000000-0x280000fff 64bit]
...
[ 0.138300] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000)
[ 0.138300] PCI: not using MMCONFIG
[ 0.148014] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000)
[ 0.149674] [Firmware Info]: PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
[ 0.149679] PCI: not using MMCONFIG
[ 0.155052] acpi PNP0A08:00: fail to add MMCONFIG information, can't access extended PCI configuration space under this bridge.
This new MCRS, tested on the Star Lite Mk IV, resolves these issues:
[ 0.158786] pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 2: assigned to efifb
[ 0.197391] pci 0000:00:1f.1: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x280000000-0x2800000ff 64bit]
...
[ 0.138460] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem
0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000)
[ 0.138460] PCI: not using MMCONFIG
[ 0.150889] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem
0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000)
[ 0.152548] PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
Signed-off-by: Sean Rhodes <sean@starlabs.systems>
Change-Id: Ib6fc58efc9aadb5828251e0260622dac7ea3ef2b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66244
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Different PCHs have different definitions for registers. Here create
a lbg folder and move lbg specific codes to this folder so that we
can add new PCH code under xeon_sp folder.
* Create lbg folder and move lbg specific codes from pch.c to soc_pch.c
under lbg folder.
* Rename lewisburg_pch_gpio_defs.h to gpio_soc_defs.h and move to lbg
folder.
* Rename gpio.c to soc_gpio.c and move to lbg folder.
* Move pcr_ids.h to lbg folder.
* Move lbg specific codes from pmutil.c to soc_pmutil.c under lbg
folder.
* Create and revise makefile for files under lbg folder.
TEST=Can boot into OS on OCP Delta Lake.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chu <Tim.Chu@quantatw.com>
Change-Id: I06555ed6612c632ea2ce1938d81781cd9348017a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/70009
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This patch avoids hardcoding to the `use_eisa_hids` variable instead
relying on the SoC config to choose if the SoC platform supports
EISA HID.
If any SoC platform has the support then the `use_eisa_hids` variable
would be set to `true` based on the selection of `DPTF_USE_EISA_HID`
config.
Note: Prior to Tiger Lake, all DPTF devices used 7-character EISA
IDs. If selected, the 7-character _HIDs will be emitted,
otherwise, it will use the "new" style, which are regular
8-character _HIDs.
Ideally, the platform prior to Tiger Lake would set `use_eisa_hids`
to `true` and platform posts that would set `use_eisa_hids` to
`false`.
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Change-Id: I869bebc8e17c1e65979ca3431308d69771a34fa3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71110
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tarun Tuli <taruntuli@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal@google.com>
